28. Exact drafts of all the laws are proposing

.

This webpage has list and details of all the drafts we are proposing

http://rahulmehta.com/all_drafts.htm

.

27. MRCM proposals to improve law-making

.

27.1 The problem and solutions in short

There are two basic problems with law-making as of now

1. First problem : MPs do not make laws we citizens want. eg MPs refused to enact laws that we commons want to obtain land rent.
2. Second problem : MPs make laws that citizens dont want. eg 498A , DVA laws etc
   

Following are our demands , promises to solve these two problems

1. The second MRCM EN would enable citizens to issue Govt Ordinances and thus second EN solves first problem to a considerable extent
2. We are proposing a procedure by which citizen can register effective YES/NO in the Parliament by paying Rs 3 fee at Talati’s office. This will further reduce first problem I cited above
3. We demand , promise a Jury System over law made by Parliament to deal with second problem.
4. We propose citizens’ review system to reduce second problem.
   

Above are our proposals at National level. We have similar proposals at State levels as well.

27.2 MRCM Party’s demand , promise to register citizens’ YES/NO in Parliament

Following is the Govt Ordinance we demand :

1. Any citizen can inward the text of a Bill in the PM's office and obtain an inward number.
2. Any citizen can go to the Talati, show his ID, pay Rs. 3 fee and register his YES/NO on any of the suggested bills. The clerk will give receipt for his YES/NO. The citizen can change his YES/NO any day. The YES/NO will be published on the internet and notice boards. (Please note that there is no confidentiality).
3. An MP can register his YES/NO before the Speaker. If the MP does not register YES/NO, it would be counted as NO.
4. The MP's vote will count for those, all those, but ONLY those who have NOT registered their YES/NO on that bill.
   
5. Example: Suppose an area 50000 voters where say 15000 (30%) voted YES, 5000 (10%) votes NO and 30000 (60%) did not cast their vote on the proposal. In that case, the Speaker will consider MP’s weight as (100% - 30% - 10%) = 60%. Now say that the MP votes YES. Then that area’s YES-fraction will be 30% + 60% = 90% and NO-fraction will be 10%. If the MP votes NO, then that area’s YES fraction be 30% and NO-fraction will be 60% + 10% = 70%.
6. The Speaker will add the YES and NO fractions of each ward
7. If the sum of YES-fractions is over 50% within 60 days, the Loksabha Speaker will send the bill to the Rajyasabha Speaker. If the proposal does not gather 50% support within 60 days after issue of inward number, the Loksabha Speaker will declare the proposal as failed.
8. The Rajyasabha Speaker will let Rajyasabha MPs register their YES/NO starting the day bill gets inward number. If an MP does not register his vote, it will be taken as a NO.
9. The Speaker of Rajyasabha will calculate the YES-fraction and NO-fraction of the bill as follow :
• say a state has K MPs
• say that state has T voters of which Y voted YES and N voted no, and (T – Y – N) did not register their YES or NO
• then each MPs’ of that state’s vote will be (T – Y – N)/K.
10. If passed, it shall have the same weight as Bill passed by the Parliament
    

The above mentioned procedure will enable citizens to enact the law they want.

27.3 Draft to implement the above law

#	Procedure for	Procedure / instruction
1	-	The word citizen would mean a registered voter
2	Cabinet Secretary (Center)	The Cabinet Secretary will accept a proposal for enacting a law from any citizen for a fee of Rs 200 plus Rs 200 per page (of size no larger than A4) and issue a serial number to the proposal.
3	Talati , (or Talati’s Clerks)	In next 90 days after a proposal for change is registered by Cabinet Secretary, the Talati/clerks will allow the citizens to register their YES/NO on the Bill. The clerk will take following things from the citizen : a)Rs 3/- fee b)citizen's ID c)Bill’s serial number d)his YES or NO preference. The clerk will then make the entries in the computer and will give a computer generated receipt to the citizen.
4	Talati	The Talati, for a fee of Rs 3, will allow the citizen to change his YES/NO.
5	Talati	The Talati will post the names, serial numbers etc of the citizens who have registered their YES/NO on the internet.
6	Cabinet Secretary	The Cabinet Secretary will publish Constituency wise YES/NO counts of each Constituency for each of proposals every Monday and on the 90th day after proposal was submitted.
7	Speakers (Loksabha, Rajyasabha)	The Speakers will allow MPs to register total or partial YES/NO. If an MP does NOT register YES/NO, the Speakers will count his vote as total NO.
8	Loksabha Speaker	The Speaker will calculate the YES-fraction and NO-fraction every Loksabha constituency as follows : T = Total No. of voters in that constituency. Y = No. of voters who voted YES, so citizens' YES-fraction = Y/T N = Number of voters who voted NO, so citizens' NO-fraction = N/T M = No. of voters who did not vote on the Bill = T - Y - N if MP votes YES, then YES-fraction will be (Y+M)/T and NO-fraction will be N/T if MP votes NO, then YES-fraction will be Y/T and NO-fraction will be (N+M)/T. if MP abstains, then YES-fraction will be Y/T and NO-fraction will be N/T.
9	Loksabha Speaker	The Speaker will add YES-fractions and NO-fractions of all the Loksabha constituency to obtain the total YES fraction of the State.
10	Loksabha Speaker	The Speaker will declare bill as "failed if NO-fraction exceeds YES-fraction. if YES-fraction is larger than NO-fraction then the Speaker will send the bill to the Rajyasabha Speaker
11	Rajyasabha Speaker	Within 30 days after a bill has been presented, a member of Rajyasabha can register his YES/NO on the bill before the Speaker. If a member does NOT register his YES/NO, the Speaker will take it as a NO.
12	Rajyasabha Speaker	Speaker will use following formula to calculate the YES fraction and NO fraction Y = Number of voters in India who voted YES N = Number of voters in India who voted NO T = Total number of citizen-voters in India U = Number of citizens who didn’t vote = T - Y - N MY = Number of Rajyasabha members who voted YES MN = Number of Rajyasabha members who voted NO (or did not register their vote) MT = Total number of Members Then YES fraction = Y/T + MY/MT*U/T NO fraction = N/T + MN/MT*U/T
13	Rajyasabha Speaker	If the YES fraction exceeds NO fraction, Speaker will declare the bill as passed, else he will declare the bill as failed.

27.4 MRCM Party’s demand , promise to enact Jury System over Laws made by MPs

Due to bribery, and no other reasons, the MPs have been enacting laws like SEZ act, 498A, DVA etc. How can citizens top this mess? The third proposal enables citizens to cancel any unconstitutional law that MPs have made. But that will be after they have passed this law. How can citizens stop wrong laws to begin with? Well, the following law will reduce this possibility :

1. After the law is passed by Parliament, the PM shall send the copy of law in English and State’s official languages to each Tahsildar of India
2. Each Tahsildar will summon 30 citizen voters each from the voter list as Jurors.
3. Each of the 30 citizens can suggest one speaker. Ten of these 30 suggested speakers will be chosen at random. The 10 suggested speakers or their representative will give 1 hr speech on the law passed.
4. The MP who drafted and proposed the law can send one or more representatives who shall have the total speech time of 3 hours.
5. Each Juror can ask speak for 30 minutes in which he may make a speech or ask questions to any of the persons who has given the speeches on the law passed.
6. Each day, the proceedings will start at 10.30 AM and will go on till 6.30 PM with 2.00 PM to 2.30 PM as lunch break. So proceedings will last for no more than 6 days.
7. At the end of 3rd day, the Jurors will specify their YES/NO on the laws passed.
8. If over 16 out of 30 Jurors say NO or “no option”, the Tahsildar will mark the law as rejected.
9. If majority of the Tahsil Juries in India reject the law, the PM will declare the law as rejected.
   

There are 6000 wards and Tahsils in India. So some 6000 * 30 = 180,000 citizens YES/NO will taken on the law passed. Given that time is just 3 days, this is a fairly large sample which is difficult to bribe out. Hence, this sample will be an effective check on the Parliament. Each Juror will get say Rs 100 and so cost is Rs 1.8 crore plus other costs (such as salary of Tahsildar who will conduct the hearings etc). The total cost will be about Rs 5 crore per law Parliament passes. The Parliament passes some 100 laws a year. So total cost will be Rs 500 cr per year of so. This is tiny compared to damage one wrong law can cause. Using such mechanism, it becomes easier for citizens to ensure that SEZ, 498A, DVA etc like laws do not come up.

27.6 Other party’s stand on this issues

The MPs of other party such as Congress, BJP, CPM etc have flatly told citizens --- citizens cannot register their YES/NO in Parliament. we request citizens and non-80G-activists not to vote and campaign for these corrupt leaders.

.

26. Improvement in civil laws we demand

.

26.1 Summary of changes in civil laws we demand , promise

We have demanded, proposed, 10s of detailed changes in civil laws. Some of them are

1. Enacting Land Record System (Torrance System)
2. Enacting administrative system to record all loans and restrict usury
3. Enacting administrative changes to settle loan default cases
4. Speedy divorce, alimony and child custody to abused women
5. Repealing 498A, DVA
6. Enacting administrative changes settle inheritance related disputes fairly
   

26.2 Enacting land/flat ownership record system

We request the reader to gather information on Torrens Title . We demand , promise to enact this system in India to resolve the mess in the land record system.

26.3 Laws to stop usury and solve loan defaults

The procedure to enact system by which citizens can replace police chiefs, and also enact Jury System over junior policemen. This will reduce the strength of nexuses between users and policemen. In addition, we will enforce every lender to disclose the loans he has given and disclose the interest he is charging, and stop the usury by enabling Jurors to imprison the users. The ceiling on interest will be 1.5 times the prime lending rate. (eg as of Jun-2008, PLR is 1.25% a month, and so limit on private lending will be 2.5% a month).

26.4 Laws to fix family disputes

We shall codify marital contracts and make them valid unless one-sided. Fair Minimal Alimony and child custody shall be married woman’s right upon separation or divorce. In addition, if the woman is facing abuses, we shall empower the Jurors to give prompt divorce with alimony and child custody.
We promise to repeal one-sided laws like 498A and DVA.


26.5 Other party’s stand

No party is interested in repealing 498A and have supported DVA.

26.6 Details

Details will be soon posted on this web-page.

26. Improving Changes in civil laws we demand , promise

Contents

1. Summary of changes in civil laws we demand , promise
2. Enacting land/flat ownership record system
3. Laws to stop usury and solve loan defaults
4. Laws to fix family disputes
5. Other party’s stand
6. Details



1. Summary of changes in civil laws we demand , promise

We have demanded, proposed, 10s of detailed changes in civil laws. Some of them are

1. Enacting Land Record System (Torrance System)
2. Enacting administrative system to record all loans and restrict usury
3. Enacting administrative changes to settle loan default cases
4. Speedy divorce, alimony and child custody to abused women
5. Repealing 498A, DVA
6. Enacting administrative changes settle inheritance related disputes fairly



2. Enacting land/flat ownership record system

We request the reader to gather information on Torrens Title . We demand , promise to enact this system in India to resolve the mess in the land record system.


3. Laws to stop usury and solve loan defaults

The procedure to enact system by which citizens can replace police chiefs, and also enact Jury System over junior policemen. This will reduce the strength of nexuses between users and policemen. In addition, we will enforce every lender to disclose the loans he has given and disclose the interest he is charging, and stop the usury by enabling Jurors to imprison the users. The ceiling on interest will be 1.5 times the prime lending rate. (eg as of Jun-2008, PLR is 1.25% a month, and so limit on private lending will be 2.5% a month).


4. Laws to fix family disputes

We shall codify marital contracts and make them valid unless one-sided. Fair Minimal Alimony and child custody shall be married woman’s right upon separation or divorce. In addition, if the woman is facing abuses, we shall empower the Jurors to give prompt divorce with alimony and child custody.
We promise to repeal one-sided laws like 498A and DVA.


5. Other party’s stand

No party is interested in repealing 498A and have supported DVA.


6. Details

Details will be soon posted on this web-page.

Main Page Feedback? MehtaRahulC@yahoo.com Orkut Community For Discussions

25. Decreasing reservation with the support of poor SC, ST and OBCs

.

25.1 First modification : giving higher preference to more backward

The communities which have lesser representation in administration will get more seats till their representation is at the same level. For this we need a complete caste census and details are given later.

25.2 Second modification : the system of economic-choice , social choice

What makes us different from all parties is that we support an administrative system, called as economic-preference as opposed to social preference to reduce demand for reservation in SC, ST and OBCs. Following is the summary of the system of second-choice for Dalits, OBCs

1. Any member of a sub-caste that belongs to ST, SC or OBC can walk to Tahsildar’s office, undergo verification and apply for economic-choice , where in
• he shall still retain his SC, ST, OBC status
• he shall receive inflation adjusted Rs 100 per month, till he cancels economic-choice
• he will be eligible for reservation moment he cancels his economic-choice
• the number of reserved seats will decrease by 50% of those who opt for economic-choice
• the money shall come from tax on commercial , residential, industrial land and nowhere else
2. Example : India has 100 cr of population of which 14% i.e. 14 cr are SC. So if a college has 1000 seats of then 140 are reserved . Now suppose out of these 14 cr SCs, say 6 cr insist on economic-choice then each shall get payment of Rs 100 a month and reservation for SC will go down by 14*0.66*6/14 = 3.9% i.e. will become about 9.1%.
   

Most poor Dalits did not get much benefit from Reservation, and as elite in Dalits increases in size, the opportunities for poor dalits further reduces. The economic-choice creates a system by which the poor left out dalits can also get benefit of the reservation as well. Many of them would opt for economic-choice as (opposed to social-choice that reservation offers). This will reduce reservation

25.3 Other steps to reduce demand for reservation

1. Reducing casteism in courts : The demand for reservation is high, as there is intense nepotism , casteism in courts. Due to rampant nepotism , casteism, commons of Dalits , OBCs also feel desire to have “their own” men in courts etc. The laws we have proposed to improve courts reduce casteism , nepotism in courts and will thus reduce the demand for reservation in Dalits, OBCs etc. The decrease in corruption in courts will also decrease demand in Dalit, OBC youth to become judges.
2. Reducing corruption, atrocities in police : The demand for reservation is high, as there is intense corruption and atrocities in policemen. Due to rampant corruption and high handedness, members Dalits and OBCs also feel desire to have “their own” men in police etc. The laws we have proposed to improve police reduce corruption in police as well as atrocities. This will reduce the demand for caste based reservation in Dalits, OBCs etc. The decrease in corruption in courts will also decrease demand in Dalit, OBC youth to become policemen and will reduce intensity of demand for caste based reservation in police.
3. Reducing corruption in administration : Due to rampant corruption and high handedness, members Dalits and OBCs also feel desire to have “their own” men in administration etc. The laws we have proposed to improve police reduce corruption and arbitrariness in administration. This will reduce the demand for caste based reservation in Dalits, OBCs etc. This will also decrease desire in educated. The decrease in corruption in courts will also decrease demand in Dalit, OBC youth to become policemen and will reduce intensity of demand for caste based reservation in police.
4. English education : The education in English is lower in Dalit, OBCs due to upper caste intellectuals’ decision to discourage English education in Govt schools as far as possible. Many upper caste who were well off sent their kids to English schools or other local language schools, but at least English was taught properly. As a result, OBC, Dalits get less score in many subjects where preparation material is English. Once universal English education is implemented, the scores of Dalits, OBCs will reduce and this will reduce demand for reservation.
   

25.4 Over all stand on reservation

MRCM’s forth demand-cum-promise will substantially reduce poverty. And the changes we propose in education will further reduce poverty and economic gap between dalits and upper castes. And the changes we propose in religious charities will reduce the discrimination they face in temples, and with that social discrimination shall also reduce. We demand and promise to end ALL interviews at the level of initial recruitment in Police, Govt, banks, RBI, SBI, judiciary, Govt lawyer and so forth, and this will also reduce the discrimination Dalits face in recruitment. So the % score gap between closing rank general and reserved categories would reduce day by day.
But as of now, we support Caste based Reservation. We believe in reducing the strife by increasing education in dalits so that % gap in closing rank decreases, and by reducing demand for reservation in dalits using the proposed system of economic-choice.
In addition, we propose following modification in reservation

1. No reservation for Dalits, Tribals and OBCs who are not Hindu, Buddhists or Sikh. To be specific, no reservation for Dalits, Tribals, OBCs in Muslims, Christians etc.
2. The Dalit, Tribal or OBC if applicable for reservation, will have to first apply in their respective quota and only after their quota is filled, can they apply in general quota
3. No reservation on any other basis, including religion, economic or social
4. Create a system of economic-choice to reduce demand for reservation
5. Ensure that backward amongst backward get benefits using sub-quota or other means
   

These are our broad proposals. The next section gives details.

25.5 Details of administrative changes we promise on reservation issue

Economic-Choice System

1. Any member of a sub-caste that belongs to ST, SC or OBC can walk to Tahsildar’s office, undergo verification and apply for economic-choice , where in
• he shall still retain his SC, ST, OBC status
• he shall receive inflation adjusted Rs 150 per month, till he cancels economic-choice
• till he gets this payment, he cannot apply in reserved quota.
• he will be eligible for reservation the day he cancels his second-choice
• the number of reserved seats will decrease depending on number of those who have opted-out
• the money shall come from tax on commercial , residential, industrial land and nowhere else.
2. Example : India has 100 cr of population of which 14% i.e. 14 cr are SC. So if a college has 1000 seats of then 140 are reserved . Now suppose out of these 14 cr SCs, say 6 cr insist on economic-choice then each shall get payment of Rs 100 a month and reservation for SC will go down by 14*0.66*6/14 = 5.94% i.e. will become 8.06% IOW, if every SC were to take economic choice, the reservation would become 1/3 of what it is now. The reservation will be across ran and file of administration, from Supreme Court to peons
3. If a person has opted for economic-choice and then changes to social-choice, he will be entitled for CBR benefits on that day. But if he reverts back to economic choice, he shall get Rs 100/mo payment after 6 months
4. If a person is Dalit, OBC has opted for economic-choice, he can still obtain seat on quota, but shall become eligible after he cancels economic-choice
5. If a person has taken any seat on SC/ST or OBC quota, he will not be eligible for economic-choice
6. The Rs 100/mo payment will come for a child below 18 only if both parents opt for economic-choice
7. If both parents have opted for economic-choice, their children shall get Rs 200/mo for at most (2 sons) or (2 sons, 1 daughter).
   

Caste census

1. Conduct a full wealth and sub-caste census : Caste strife is a reality. It cannot vanish by hiding it and it cant be dealt administratively if it is hidden. To properly deal with any issue, administration needs crystal clear information. So we propose to take sub-caste census where in sub-caste of each person along with position he holds in Govt, PSU and market value of land/assets he owns will be noted. The census will improve with National-ID system and an accurate system with less than 1% inaccuracy can be built in 2-4 years. But an approximate system can be built in 6 months. We shall start with the inaccurate system and increase the accuracy every day.
2. There are about 200 sub-castes in India, but since social situation between a caste in one state and analogous caste in another state may be different, they become different caste in the National list. So the National List has about 5000 castes, while most States’ Lists have about 200-400 sub-castes. So the census will note which of the 5000 state-wise sub-caste the person belongs to. Please note – sub-castes will be state-wise only.
3. If a person claims to general, then he need not specify caste or sub-caste and shall not get any benefit of reservation. But if a person or his father has taken benefit of reservation, then he must specify the caste, state and sub-caste he belongs to.
4. Using person-caste-wealth data, PM can obtain per capita wealth of sub-caste.
5. Political Wellness Index : The Political Index of a caste will be calculated as follows
   

Position Points

Position	Points
PM, Supreme Court judge, HC-Cj, Regulators in Central Govt , RBI Gov, RBI Deputy Gov, Bank Chairman	50,00,000 points
High Court judges, Principal Session judges, Dept Secretaries in Central Govt, regulators in State Govt, CM	40,00,000 points
Sessions judges, Ministers in Center	10,00,000 points
Other lower court judges, Ministers in State	5,00,000 points
MP, officers above Under Secretaries	1,00,000 points
MLA , District Panchayat Sarpanch	15,000 points
All class-I officers in Central, State Govt, Police etc (not PSUs)	20,000 points
All class-II officers in Central, State Govt, Police , etc	10,000 points
All class-III officers in Central, State Govt, Police etc	5,000 points
All employees in PSUs, Central Govt, State Govt etc (including above)	Annual Basic Salary divided by 100
Person with 10,00,000 times the per capita wealth	100,00,000 points
Person with 1,00,000 times the per capita wealth	10,00,000 points
Person with 10,000 times the per capita wealth	1,00,000 points
Person with 1000 times the per capita wealth	10,000 points
Person with 100 times the per capita wealth	1,000 points

The castes with lower points would get more seats within their quota. The details will be provided on this webpage later.

25.6 Some rough idea of economic choice

Hypothetically, if entire 60cr of SC, ST and OBC population were to go on economic choice, then the quota would reduce from 50% to 50%/4 = about 12.5% and costs will be Rs 1200 * 60 = Rs 72,000cr a year. But that is an extreme scenario.

25.7 Against some anti-reservationists, who are hypocrites

We oppose the upper caste anti-reservation activists who oppose reservation on the basis of merit, and then shamelessly support laws that promote nepotism in judge, promote self finance colleges where merit is not even asked for and promote interview system which upper caste have been using to filter out dalits. We strongly and intensely hate the intellectuals and activists who have supported pro-nepotism , anti-Dalit laws and then opposed reservation by using excuse of merit. IMO, they are hypocrites not worth talking to. We are open to debate on reservation and explain why we support reservation, but with only those adversaries who can give in writing that they oppose the following laws 1. judge shall appoint judges. 2. judges shall give judgments and not Jurors 3. interviews in judiciary and administration.

25.8 Against some pro-reservationists, who are also hypocrites

There are those who oppose reservation, and support nepotism in courts and administration. I call them anti-reservation hypocrites. And then there are those elite SC, ST and OBCs who insist on en-cashing on the plight of poor OBCs, SCs, STs etc . We oppose hypocrites of this categories as well.

.

24. Removing Govt Control over Temples and other places of worship

.

Within one year, we promise to enact National/State-level Community Temple Trusts along the line of SGPC for all communities, sects and hand them over all the temples currently under Govt. The heads of the trusts will be replaceable by the members, and the membership will be via birth or conversion and acceptance. The heads will not be hereditary or appointed by any foreign power such as Vatican.

We at MRCM also promise to give plots of Ram Janam Bhoomi, Kashi Vishwanath and Krishna Janam Bhoomi plots to the National Hindu Temple Community Trusts, whose head will be repleceable in one year using YESes of citizens. It has been proven again and again that Muslims had no objection against the 3 plots demanded by Hindus. The problem has worsened because Muslims were worried about BJP increasing the number from 3 to 3000 or 30,000. Essentially, it was Muslims’ lack in faith in BJP which has created the deadlock, not lack of Muslims’ faith in Hindus. The Muslims do not have faith in BJP MPs (neither do Hindus for that matter), but Muslims do have faith in Hindus as a whole. Hence if the law says that transfer of plot would need approval of 51% of citizens, it is ensured that Hindus will confine the demand to the three plots. This will resolve the 17 year old problem for once and for all and restore the communal peace in India.

The details will be provided on this webpage later.

.

23. Changes in administration to solve JK problem

.

The administrative change to solve JK problem is as follows: using 3rd suggested change (wherein citizens can register YES/NO in Parliament), we citizens should enact following changes

1. Request JK MLAs to ask Parliament to repeal Art-370
2. Merge JK with Uttaranchal and Himachal Pradesh
3. Enact law that would enable any Indian citizen to lease lands in JK for 25 years
4. Encourage retired Military and retired Policemen from all over India to settle into Kashmir areas
   

.
We shall later describe the details on this web-page.

22. MRCM proposals to reduce Bangladeshies' inflow, expel them

.

22.1 The problem of Bangladeshi infiltration

The whole North East may get seceded and lakhs of Indians may be killed (like 1947) if Bangladeshies keep coming.

22.2 Stand of other Political Parties on Bangladeshi infiltration

Most parties such as Congress, BJP and CPM have decided to nothing to stop Bangladeshi illegal immigrants. The Congress in its 45+ years of rule and BJP in its 7 years of rule did not even enact ID system to reduce this problem. I request every supporter of Congress, BJP and CPM to realize that if when North East becomes part of Bangladesh and lakhs of Indians get massacred like 1947, their voting for these corrupt neta was one factor.

We demand , promise to enact Person-ID system coupled with “Employee and payment disclosure law” . In one year, these two laws will reduce the new infiltration to 1% of what it is now. And we demand , promise to enact Jury based Tribunals to decide citizenship issue for existing infiltrators. Once illegal immigrants land in prison, they will stop coming.

22.3 The useless of the fence solution

The BJP, Congress and CPM leaders are misguiding citizens by showing the fence they are creating. We support the fence and we shall continue it ; but we want citizens to note that fence cannot reduce infiltration even by 1%. Please allow us to mention a joke to make this point clear

A review committee appointed by Railway Minister to decrease fatality in accidents said that in most accidents, most fatalities are in first two and last two compartments. So to decrease fatalities, this Review Committee of Experts insists that the first two and last two compartments should be moved into middle !!

This joke will explain the futility of the 1000 km long fence. Today, Bangladeshies are using land rather than sea coast to come into India as land option is cheaper. But coming from coast line i also easy and not all that expensive. So once the land is fenced, Bangladeshies will use coast line to enter into India !! Now are we going to build fence along whole coast line of India or even West Bengal? We cant. So even after fence is made, illegal immigration will not reduce even by 1%
And consider the countries who have drastically reduced the problem of illegal immigration such as Canada, Sweden, Norway, Germany, Australia, New Zealand etc. The way these Western countries have solved this problem is via punishing the employers who give employment to illegals. US Govt wants illegal immigration to come to keep cost low and so US Govt has not made any law to punish employers who hire illegals. But US can afford illegal immigration as illegal immigrants do not pose any security or secessionist threats and provide economic benefits. But the countries that do not want illegal immigrants like Canada, Germany etc have made laws that require employers to disclose employee’s IDs and punish employers who hide this information. This disables organized employers from hiring illegal employees and reduces illegal immigration.

22.4 MRCM demands , promises to reduce Bangladeshies inflow , expel them

1. Enact National Person-ID , Citizen ID system
2. Enact Govt Order that employers will be required to report Person-ID of all employees
3. Enact Jury System to imprison an employer if he hid the information about illegal employees he had
4. Jury Trials to decide whether a person accused is citizen or illegal immigrant
   

We have discussed the first (3) proposals before. Next section has details of 4th proposal.

22.5 Building Family Trees using DNA data

Lets say as on Jan-1 of year XXXX everyone’s DNA data of every person over 3 months old is in the system. Now each person can be asked to give IDs of his relatives, and using DNA data, the relations can be verified to a considerable extent as parent-child has 50% DNA in common, siblings with same both parents have over 50% DNA in common, with one parent same have 25% DNA in common, grand child and grand parent have 25% in common, cousins have about 25% DNA in common and so forth. Using this, number of blood relatives a person can be established. Higher the number of blood relatives he has, lesser are the chances the that he is immigrant. And thus using blood relative information validated or invalidated by DNA data, many illegal Bangladeshies who have just zero or few blood relatives can be easily identified out.

22.6 Jury System to decide citizenship

1. In first year, Govt will create Person-ID system
2. The Register shall make CDs of Person-ID database of every male (and later females) with name, Person-ID, photo, address etc and sell it at cost.
3. Any person can cite names of 10 person whom he thinks are non-citizens after paying Rs 3 fee.
4. From the names received, the Registrar shall order the accused in the order of number of complaints received against him of being non-citizen.
5. The Registrar shall notify all the relatives of the person accused
6. For every complaint he receives, the Registrar shall form a National Jury consisting of 12 citizens chosen India and State Jury consisting of 12 citizens chosen from the State.
7. Any person who is blood relative of accused can cite that the person is wrongly accused after citing his relation.
8. The Jurors will listen to the person using video phones and also the relatives. The accused and his relatives may be asked to appear in the trial. Each Juror can ask him questions for 30 minutes.
9. If over 9 out of 12 Jurors in either of the Juries dismiss the case as frivolous case, the Registrar shall not try the person against at least 10 citizens file complaint against him once again. After two trials the number of persons required to complaint against him will be 100 and after 3 trials, no complaint will be filed against him for 5 years.
10. If the complain is dismissed as frivolous, the complainer’s right to file complain will go down by one.
11. If over 9 out 12 Jurors in both Juries declare the accused as non-citizen, the Registrar will call one more National and one more State Jury. If the Juries give same decision, the Registrar will mark him as non-citizen, imprison him and start process to expel him out of India.
12. If less than 10 out 12 Jurors in any Juries, but more 8 out of 12 in any one Jury declare the accused as non-citizen, the Registrar will let the accused stay in India, but not in North East or West Bengal. This clause is essential to reduce concentration of the Bangladeshies in North East
    

22.7 Stand of other parties’ leaders

Other parties such as Congress, CPM, BJP are least interested in even stopping Bangladeshies forget expelling them. We request citizens not to vote for these parties.

21. MRCM proposals to save the Hindus of Bangladesh

The MRCM Party demands , promises to enact Govt Orders necessary to bring Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan into India. The proposal is viable and does not go against Secularism. The window will be open for 10 years.

In 1947, the Hindus of India, against their wish, accepted that Pakistan (with Bangladesh) will be Muslim State which clearly meant that Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh will have no place there. This automatically gave rights to Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh over India. The window to enter into India was closed without notice and without informing them. Hence we must open that window for Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh , and close say after 10 years after fully informing them.

The secularism in Constitution restricts Govt of India inside India . So if GoI places a notice in Bangladesh that “Hindus will be given residency in India”, then it does not violate Constitution as no person in Bangladesh can file any complaint against GoI in Supreme Court of India, as the persons in Bangladesh have no Constitutional rights over GoI. So our MRCM Party’s demand and promise to let Hindus , and not Muslims, of Bangladesh and Pakistan enter into India and get residency , work permit and later citizenship does not violate Constitution of India.