Right to Recall Party: 2009

Saturday, August 15, 2009

32. One more way to rig EVMs and benefit one Chosen Party

Article No. 31 on this blog gives one way by which a powerful party, by asking the EVM manufacturer to put a tempered code can benefit itself. This articles describes one more trivially easy way to do the same.

Consider
BELX = A fictitious company which makes EVMs
CECX = Person in charge of dispatching EVMs
CongressX = a hypothetical party which wants to get benefited by tempering EVMs

Step-1 : The EVM manufacturer makes 3 types of EVMs

Type1 - Honest EVMs
Type2 - This EVM will increase the votes of the candidate who got second highest votes and decrease the votes of candidate who got highest votes
Type3 - This EVM will increase the votes of the candidate who got third highest votes and decrease the votes of the candidate who got highest and second highest votes

Step-2 : CongressX will divide 540 seats into 4 groups

Group1 : where congress is sure to win
Group2 : where congress is sure to come no. 2
Group3 : where congress is sure to come no. 3
Group4 : where congress is sure to come not in no.1 to no.3

This can be done by a careful pre-poll analysis, and will be as much as 80% to 90% accurate.

Step-3: CECX has to dispatch EVMs as follows

It will send Type1 EVMs to constituencies in Group1 and Group4
It will send Type2 EVMs to constituencies in Group2
It will send Type3 EVMs to constituencies in Group3

Hence, the EVMs will favor CongressX.

Example : in Gandhinagar seat, CongressX is sure to come no.2 and BJP is sure to come No.1 So if Type-2 EVMs are sent to Gandhinagar Constituency, then CongressX will win. Now sending such EVMs to Gandhinagar will expose the game as BJP leads by a huge margin. But in seats where picture is not clear, CongressX can win by sending EVMs of Type2 and Type3.

========

The moral of the story is : there are simply too many ways to rig EVMs. So we have no choice but to get rid of EVMs and use paper ballots with camera in booth.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

31. How to rigg 100,000 booths using EVMs with just 10 people at top

.

1. This is not an allegation (as of yet)

This article is NOT an allegation. It is to only show that EVMs can be rigged at super-industrial scale by few people at top. Essentially, I am making allegation against EVMs, that EVMs are riggable in an industrial scale to favor some party such Congress etc and that too with just 10 people at top. I am not making allegations against any party or EC or BEL in this article. This article is to only explain how rigging can be done.

Some 100,000 new EVMs were made in Dec-2008. And later they were dispatched to Districts, most before Mar-2009. This article shows one way how CEC, Congress could have rigged all these 100,000 EVMs to favor Congress. This is a could have scenario, not an allegation.

I propose one way by which CEC, BEL, Congress may rig 100,000 EVMs with mere 10-12 men. As of now, I am not claiming they did it. I may or may not make such claim later when time comes. Because to claim that X did action-A, I need to first convince people that action-A is indeed possible and do-able. So for now, I only want to show that rigging 100,000 EVMs is possible with few people. Once I have shown that is do-able, I may or may not show that they were in position to implement the rigging mechanism I suggested. And then I may or may not make claim that they rigged it in the way I suggested or similar such way.

In this article, I have used following fictitious names to show the process

CECX : Fictitious head of a fictitious body called EC, in charge of elections
CongressX : A fictitious party interested in rigging EVMs to favor its candidates.
SoniaX : The fictitious head of CongressX
BELX Chiefs : The persons in charge of manufacturing EVMs in fictitious body named as BELX

Pls note that resemblances to any real names is an unintended coincidence only

2. Why pre-programmed bias in EVMs was thought to be useless?

We all know that a programmer can indeed write code in EVM, that favors a particular serial number. Pls note - a particular serial number only. And if the CEO level persons in BELX agree to put such rigged code in EVM, then there is no technological or scientific barrier to stop them. There are processes to ensure that junior guys cannot change code, but nothing will stop apex seniors with money from making changes they want. But till date, everyone thinks that no one can write a code that would favor CongressX, as the serial number of CongressX candidate is undecided when the coder is writing the EVM code and undecided even when the EVM is being shipped to the District from BELX. eg say a coder and BELX Chiefs decide to favor CongressX. Now the EVM is to be shipped out in Jan-2009. CongressX candidate will get the serial number in Apr-2009. Then which candidate number should the program be coded to give more votes? The Congress's candidate number will vary from seat to seat. So if the programmer programs EVM to give more vote to candidate number 1, then only in some 20% cases only CongressX will be no. 1 . And so in 20% cases, it would benefit Congress and in 80% cases it would hurt Congress.

Some anti-EVM people has hypothesized that some keys can be inputed in EVMs to communicate the candidate number after candidate number is issued. But then inputting this key combination in 100,000 of EVMs need 100,000 men to be sent at the booth and is a difficult task. So this way was ruled out due to logistic size. So till now, it was stated by "experts" and accepted by the gullibles that "BELX cannot make an EVM that would favor CongressX".

3. BELX can make EVMs with pre-programmed that favors CongressX

But I have shown that a "pro-CongressX" EVMs be made !! How can EVMs be programmed to favor CongressX Well, pls read this article and if you have any questions, pls call me at 98251-27780 .

4. A brief description of election process

ECX divides candidates in a constituency into 3 blocks : National or State Recognized Parties, Unrecognized Registered Parties and Independents. In each block, the candidates are alphabetically ordered by their names in the local language. There are 7 Nationally recognized parties and different states have0-4 State recognized parties. So if all recognized parties put their candidates, the number of candidates in first block will go to 7-11. But the reality is that all recognized parties do not put candidates in every seat. eg CPM hasnt put candidates in many seats since ages. In general, having 5 recognized party on one seat is a rare event. And so a recognized Party is will get a number between 1-5 with 99% guarantee in general. And as a reality check, one can look at 2009 election. All Congress candidates got serial number between 1-5 on the ballot paper. Further, EVMs can support only 64 candidates. If there are more than 64 candidates, EC will need to use paper ballots, a condition that has never come as deposits are regularly raised to ensure that nCandidates is below 64.

Now following dates play important role in "how EVMs can be made to favor a Party".

Say opening date to fill form is Apr-2.
Then last date to fill form will be say Apr-8.
By Apr-10, candidates will get accepted or disqualified by RO (RO = Returning Office, mostly the District Collector).
On Apr-11, candidates of Congress and other recognized parties will get to know their serial candidate number on EVM (*)
Last day to withdraw will be say Apr-13, 3pm.
Say on Apr-13, 3pm is the last date to withdraw form.
So total number of candidates will be known on Apr-13, about 4pm. Pls note this : total number of candidates plays important role in how EVMs can be made to favor Congress-X

[* - Since recognized parties get top slot, on Apr-9, the candidates of recognized parties will get to know their candidate number The last minute withdrawal of candidate of other nationally/state recognized party can change the candidate number. But wont have any impact on the scheme I am proposing.]

5. Recognized parties' candidates are mostly in 1-5

I will repeat why.

EC (Election Commission) divides candidates in a constituency into 3 blocks : National or State Recognized Parties, Unrecognized Registered Parties and Independents. In each block, the candidates are alphabetically ordered by their names in the local language. There are 7 Nationally recognized parties and different states have0-4 State recognized parties. So if all recognized parties put their candidates, the number of candidates in first block will go to 7-11. But the reality is that all recognized parties don t put candidates in every seat. eg CPM hasnt put candidates in many seats since ages. In general, having 5 recognized party on one seat is a rare event. And so a recognized Party is will get a number between 1-5 with 99% guarantee in general. And as a reality check, one can look at 2009 election. All Congress candidates got serial number between 1-5 on the EVM.

6. Step-One : What rigged code to put in EVMs

Say BELX chiefs made 5 different types of rigged EVMs.

Type-1 favors candidate number = (nCandidates + 1) mod 5 + 1 (what is mod?)
Type-2 favors candidate number = (nCandidates + 2) mod 5 + 1
Type-3 favors candidate number = (nCandidates + 3) mod 5 + 1
Type-4 favor's candidate number = (nCandidates + 4) mod 5 + 1
Type-5 favor's candidate number = (nCandidates + 5) mod 5 + 1

(The mod5 is just an example function. If I were to make rigged EVMs, I would use more complex functions.)

Now what is "mod"?

It is remainder left after division, i.e. ( 16 mod 5 ) means the number you are left with when you divide 16 by 5 which 1. So
(1 mod 5 ) = 1
(2 mod 5 ) = 2
(3 mod 5 ) = 3
(4 mod 5 ) = 4
(5 mod 5 ) = 0

(6 mod 5 ) = 1
(7 mod 5 ) = 2

The mod will keep repeating. There are only 5 values (n mod 5) can have.

So BELX made file types of rigged EVMs. A rigged EVM decides candidate to favor based on total number of candidates based on the following table

if the rigged EVM is of type-1 then

if there are 6 ,11 , 16 , 21 or ... , 61 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 3
if there are 2 , 7 , 12 , 17 or ... , 62 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 4
if there are 3 , 8 , 13 , 18 or ... , 63 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 5
if there are 4 , 9 , 14 , 19 or ... , 64 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 1
if there are 5 ,10 , 15 , 20 or ... , 60 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 2

if the rigged EVM is of type-2 then

if there are 6 ,11 , 21, 25 or ... , 61 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 4
if there are 7 ,12 , 22, 27 or ... , 62 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 5
if there are 3 , 8 , 13 , 23 or ... , 63 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 1
if there are 4 , 9 , 14 , 24 or ... , 64 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 2
if there are 5 ,10 , 15 , 25 or ... , 65 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 3

if the rigged EVM is of type-3 then

if there are 6 ,11 , 16 , 21 or ... , 61 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 5
if there are 2 , 7 , 12 , 17 or ... , 62 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 1
if there are 3 , 8 , 13 , 18 or ... , 63 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 2
if there are 4 , 9 , 14 , 19 or ... , 64 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 3
if there are 5 ,10 , 15 , 20 or ... , 60 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 4

if the rigged EVM is of type-4 then

if there are 6 ,11 , 16 , 21 or ... , 61 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 1
if there are 2 , 7 , 12 , 17 or ... , 62 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 2
if there are 3 , 8 , 13 , 18 or ... , 63 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 3
if there are 4 , 9 , 14 , 19 or ... , 64 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 4
if there are 5 ,10 , 15 , 20 or ... , 60 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 5

if the rigged EVM is of type-5 then

if there are 6 ,11 , 16 , 21 or ... , 61 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 2
if there are 2 , 7 , 12 , 22 or ... , 62 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 3
if there are 3 , 8 , 13 , 23 or ... , 63 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 4
if there are 4 , 9 , 14 , 24 or ... , 64 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 5
if there are 5 ,10 , 15 , 25 or ... , 60 candidates, then this EVM will favor candidate no. 1

To give example, say one constituency has say 200 rigged EVMs of type-3. Now say that constituency has say if nCandidates = 19. Then the rigged EVMs there will favor candidate number (19 + 2) mod 5 + 1 = 21 mod 5 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2 . i.e. it will favor candidate number 2.

To give one more example, say one constituency has say 200 rigged EVMs of type-4. Now say that constituency has say if nCandidates = 11. Then the rigged EVMs there EVM will favor candidate number (11 + 4) mod 5 + 1 = 15 mod 5 + 1 = 0 + 1 = 1 . i.e. it will favor candidate number 1.

Lets make converse of the above table. The following converse table will be used in Step-3 by SoniaX. I request the reader to reach each of the 30 lines in the following converse table.

if the rigged EVMs in a Constituency are all of type-1 then and

if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 1, then we should have 4 , 9 , 14 or ... , 64 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 2 , then we should have 5 ,10 , 15 or ... , 60 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 3 , then there should be 6 ,11, 16 or ... , 61 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 4 , then there should be 7 ,12, 17 or ... , 62 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 5 , then there should be 8 ,13, 18 or ... , 63 candidates

if the rigged EVMs in a Constituency are all of type-2 then and

if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 1 , then we should have 3 , 8 , 13 or ... , 63 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 2 , then we should have 4 , 9 , 14 or ... , 64 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 3 , then we should have 5 ,10 , 15 or ... , 60 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 4 , then we should have 6 ,11 , 16 or ... , 61 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 5 , then we should have 7 ,12 , 17 or ... , 62 candidates

if the rigged EVMs in a Constituency are all of type-3 then and if

if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 1 , then we should have 2 , 7 , 12 or ... , 62 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 2 , then we should have 3 , 8 , 13 or ... , 63 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 3 , then we should have 4 , 9 , 14 or ... , 64 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 4 , then we should have 5 ,10 , 15 or ... , 60 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 5 , then we should have 6 ,11 , 16 or ... , 61 candidates

if the rigged EVMs in a Constituency are all of type-4 then and

if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 1 , then we should have 6 ,11 , 16 or ... , 61 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 2 , then we should have 2 , 7 , 12 or ... , 62 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 3 , then we should have 3 , 8 , 13 or ... , 63 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 4 , then we should have 4 , 9 , 14 or ... , 64 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 5 , then we should have 5 ,10 , 15 or ... , 60 candidates

if the rigged EVMs in a Constituency are all of type-5 then and

if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 1 , then we should have 5 ,10 , 15 or ... , 60 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 2 , then we should have 6 ,11 , 16 or ... , 61 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 3 , then we should have 7, 12 , 17 or ... , 62 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 4 , then we should have 8 ,13 , 18 or ... , 63 candidates
if we want EVMs to favor candidate no. 5 , then we should have 9 ,14 , 19 or ... , 64 candidates

So step-1 is : BELX made 20,000 rigged EVMs of type1 to type5 each, which work as ab

7. Step-Two : Ensuring each seat has same type of rigged EVMs

CECX has to ensure that 200 rigged EVMs go ton each of the 500 Constituency, in away that Type of each EVM is a constituency is same. How can he ensure that? He and BELX chiefs can ensure this as follows :

BELX chiefs send 1st shipment of 20000 EVMs between dates say Jan-01 and Jan-06
BELX chiefs send 2nd shipment of 20000 EVMs between dates say Jan-07 and Jan-13
BELX chiefs send 3rd shipment of 20000 EVMs between dates say Jan-14 and Jan-20
BELX chiefs send 4th shipment of 20000 EVMs between dates say Jan-21 and Jan-27
BELX chiefs send 5th shipment of 20000 EVMs between dates say Jan-27 and Feb-07

CECX asks staff to send 200 EVMs from 1st shipment to each Constituency-001 to Constituency-100
CECX asks staff to send 200 EVMs from 2nd shipment to each Constituency-101 to Constituency-200
CECX asks staff to send 200 EVMs from 3rd shipment to each Constituency-201 to Constituency-300
CECX asks staff to send 200 EVMs from 4th shipment to each Constituency-401 to Constituency-400
CECX asks staff to send 200 EVMs from 5th shipment to each Constituency-501 to Constituency-500

So each seat has about 200 rigged EVMs of same type. And only CECX and SoniaX know the type for each Constituency.

8. Step-Three : Adjusting the number of candidates

Now take some Constituency such as Gandhinagar as example. Say in Mar-2009, say Gandhinagar Constituency got 200 rigged EVMs of type-2. Now on Apr-8, CongressX knew that its candidature number, say it was number 2. How how many candidates should be in race so that EVMs of type-3 favor the CongressX candidate? Pls look at the converse table. The answer is : if SoniaX can ensure that Gandhinagar has exactly 4 , 9 , 19 , 24 , 29 or ... 63 candidates in race, then all EVMs which are of type-2 will favor the no. 2 .

Can SoniaX ensure this? How can SoniaX ensure that number of candidates in race are 4 , 9 , 14 , 19 , 24 , 29 or ... 64 and not some other number? She can tell the Congress candidate that astrologer has asked that the number of candidates must be 4 , 9 , 14 , 19 or ... 64. And CongressX candidate has to be told to put 4 spurious independents and have 0-4 withdraw the form at last moment, so that nCandidates 4, 9, 14, 19, 24. 29, or ..., 64.

I will explain in detail. Say it is Apr-13, 3pm. Say the CongressX candidate has 4 spurious independent candidates say A, B C and D and they are in collector's room for withdrawal, along with 10 other people who want to withdraw. Now all the CongressX candidate has to manage is that these 4 people are at the end of the queue. Now say candidates have withdrawn or refused to withdraw (in which case they will leave the room) and at the end only A, B C and D are left.

now say candidate count is 20. Then CongressX can ask A to withdraw, B..D to stay in race and thus ensure that nCandidate is 19
now say candidate count is 28. Then CongressX can ask A, B, C, D to withdraw and thus ensure that nCandidate is 24
now say candidate count is 23. Then CongressX can ask A, B, C to withdraw and thus ensure that nCandidate is 19

IOW, using 0-4 candidates at the end of the withdrawal queue on Apr-13 , he can ensure that number of candidates in the race are 4, 9, 14, 19, 24. 29, or ... 64.

This is not easy as RO is not even suspecting that EVMs use nCandidates as any parameter. And in states where Congress-X has CM, SoniaX can ask CM to ask RO to put the spurious independents at the end of the queue so that they have last word n nCandidates.

In 5% cases, say CongressX fails. Then they lose 5% EVMs to opponents. But in 95% cases, the rigged EVMs will support CongressX candidate as in 95% cases, SoniaX could tweak nCandidates to favor its candidate number.

The RO (District Collector) is not a person in conspiracy. And the candidate too need not be aware of this conspiracy, for all he knows, he is doing what SoniaX's astrologer asked him to do.

9. Where would this rigging be used?

There are 543 Loksabha Constituencies. Step-One will work well as it is all in a few controlled factories. And Step-2 will work as dispatching decisions are very centralized. CongressX will not send rigged EVMs to 70-80 sure seats. Say rigged EVMs are sent to 460 seats. And out of these 460 seats, step-3 works out in 410 cases and fails in 50 cases. Then CongressX or ally candidate will get all 200 EVMs to vote for CongressX in those 460 seats. If each EVM gives him extra 300 votes, he gets 60,000 extra votes. Enough to make increase final tally by 100-150 seats.

Now please note that I am not making allegation that this indeed happened. I am saying that this can happen in future. And this is one way to rig EVMs, there can be 100s more. IOW, we know that ballot box with paper ballots was empty when poll started. In case of EVMs, we dont know what was filled in EVMs chip and whether it was biased before poll started. So I appeal to citizens of India that we should ask PM, MPs to ask EC to cancel EVMs and use paper ballots with camera in booth.

10. Compact description of rigging

A compact description of rigging is as followse

There are 5 types of rigged EVM CEC made. EVM-k favors candidate whose roll number is (nCandidates + k) mod 5 + 1 , k is between 1 to 5
Congress will know its roll number 2-3 days before candidates can withdraw. Say Congress's roll number is p and it will be between 1 and 5.
Then Congress has to ensure that, that seat has nCandidates = 5m + (p - 1) - k , m is any integer.
So in each seat, local Congress candidate has to add 4 dummy candidates and make 0-4 of the withdraw after everyone else has withdrawn, so that nCandidates is 5m + (p - 1) - k , m is any integer
If nCandidates = (5m + (p-1) - k), then that EVM will benefit candidate number

= (nCandidates + k) mod 5 + 1
= ((5m +(p-1) - k) + k ) mod 5 + 1
= (5m +(p-1)) mod 5 + 1
= p - 1 + 1
= p = the roll number of the Congress candidate.

11. Why such rigged EVMs cant be detected?

If I were to write such rigged EVM, I would do rigging only if there are over 200 votes and time EVM was left on was above 7 hours. Hence mock polls and testing would never detect this rigging
If I were to make such EVMs, I would ensure that rigging happens only once in life time and never again. So if the same EVMs are now tested, all of them will be free of rigging.
The code inside ROM cannot be read. One can read the hash code. But if the manufacturer of the chip (which is in Japan) was asked to make a chip that would give planted hash than real hash, the hash is not the hash of the code in EVM but some planted hash. Hence, there is no way to detect if EVMs used in Apr-2009 were rigged or not.

12. How to put such code in microcode of the chip

There are two place to put this rigged code in the chip. One is ROM and other is microcode. If this rigged code is in ROM, one may find out by opening the machine and scanning the ROM if lockbits are not set. If the lockbits are set, then ROM cant be read, only hash can be read. And if chip maker has agreed to make a chip that would give planted hash rather than real hash, then hash has no value. But if lockbits are not set, the code can be read.

But one can also put this rigging in microcode. How? If the microcode writer knew the EVM's code, he can find out the memory locations in RAM that stores nCandidates and counts of each candidates. And based on nCandidates and its own type k, it calculates FavoriteCandidateNo from the table given in Section-6 (Step-One). So it can add votes to the favorite candidate and deduct from the rest. Also say there were one bit of on-chip flash memory which gets reset some 8 months after manufacture. And once that bit is reset, that part of microcode will never get executed and so the microcode will become will become "honest". This is technologically very much feasible. And microcode cant be read using any equipment. So now there is no technologically feasible way to know if such a given EVM is rigged or not.

The EVM used a made in Japan chip. So if CongressX had asked that Japanese company to put trojan in microcode of the chip, which implements the table I gave, then CongressX and CECX together could have rigged 100,000 EVMs in a way we will never ever know.

13. How to put such code in microcode of the chip

My demand as of now is not to remove EVMs. My demand is that PM should issue a Govt order by which we citizens can register NO on any clause of any law at Talati's office for Rs 3 fee. (see the article number 5 in this blog for details). If PM agrees, then those who oppose EVMs will ask citizens to register NO on clause-61A of People's Representation Act of India. This section is necessary for EC to use EVMs. Once this section is deleted, EC will not be able to use EVM and will have to use paper ballots.

IOW, I want to get rid of EVMs, but via citizens of India, not via activism. I want activism to confine to creating the procedure by which we commons in India can register YES/NO at Talati's office by paying Rs 3 fee. And I am not interested in PILs, expert committees etc. IMO, it is time we citizens of India decide whether EVMs should continue or not. We must not let ECs or judges or MPs pr PM decide this anymore.

In next article I will show how paper ballots can be improved and made less expensive as well as free from problems like ballot stuffing. Pls follow the blog if you wish regular updates.

Monday, July 20, 2009

30. How can EVMs be rigged by changing cables

Since 1999, I have maintained that EVMs should be replaced by good old paper ballot, because EVMs can be rigged on a very very large scale with a very small number of persons, if the people at top have sold out. The paper ballots can be rigged, but would need too many criminals in field and so it is physically impossible to on a large scale, perticularly today where "camera in booth" is a cost effective option.

How can EVMs be rigged in a way that no one can later prove?. It is possible with just 100-200 people, provided people at top such CEC have sold out. How?

In this article, I will explain how if CEC has sold out, then using a just 100-200 people, I can rig the over 100,000 EVMs .

The EVM has 3 parts - BU (Ballot Unit), CU (Control Unit) and the cable which connects them. The easiest place to rig EVM is to replace cable by a cable which has an intelligent chip hidden in its connector. The chip will be a low power chip which can work on power coming from signals between BU and CU. IOW, a dumb cable will never cheat. But an "intelligent" cable can do following :

1. The rigged cable has clock in it and knows the polling date and time
2. On polling day, the cable would give more 20% of the votes to candidate number 2 (or X)
3. On other days, the cable will behave honestly.

Now some 15 days before polling, each candidate gets a number. eg my number was 17, that of Congress was 2 and that of BJP was 1. These numbers were given on April-14th and the poll was on April-30th. Now in those 15-16 days, if anyone manages to replace the actual cables with cables that favor candidate number X, then candidate will get 20% or more votes.

Now some 1000s or tens of thousands of EVMs were shipped from CEC warehouse to Districts on the last few days, after candidate number was given. EC is yet to disclose the EVM sending schedule. But even if all 1000-2000 EVMs were in district warehouse, replacing their cables is not a difficult task if the DC and key local officers collude.

And what is worse is : after counting, the rigged cables can be replaced with actual dumb cables. So there is no proof left.

Now how can Party-X such as Congress rig the polls? EC has rule that candidates of all Nationally registered parties will be on top. So almost everywhere, Party-X was in top 5. There are some 700,000 booths in India, and each booth has 1 EVM. The EVM has one CU, 1-3 BU and one cable. One Constituency needs 1000-2000 EVMs. Now candidate numbers were given some 15 days before polling.

So Party-X had
some 40,000 cables which favor candidate-1 (we call them set-A)
some 40,000 cables which favor candidate-2 (we call them set-B)
some 40,000 cables which favor candidate-3 (we call them set-C)
some 40,000 cables which favor candidate-4 (we call them set-D)
some 40,000 cables which favor candidate-5 (we call them set-E)

Now say 200 EVMs are to be dispatched from CEC warehouse to a Constituency where Party-X's candidate is number-3. Then if agent of Pary-X gets keys to warehouse , within 2 hours he can replace the cables of these 200 EVMs with cables in set-C. So now on polling date and time, the cable will favor Candidate No. 3 which is candidate of Party-X. And once polling is over, cables will be replaced with actual cables.

----

Did Party-X do it? I dont know. But it is surely do-able for Party-X or worse CIA. For CIA, getting 200,000 intelligent cables manufactured is child's play. And replacing them with real cables ate CEC warehouse is not possible, unless CEC is on CIA payroll. But we know that MMS is the most docile PM US had and US wanted MMS to win at all costs.

We have a system where if PM, CEC sell out, rigging for PM or CIA is trivially easy by replacing cables. SO we must abandon the system and use paper ballots which require too many people to rig even one booth, and makes rigging in even 1% of the 700,000 booth impossible.

Also, EVMs do not save costs. They are more expensive than paper. EVMs cost Rs 10,000 a piece. Paper ballots are less than Re 1 a piece. One EVM serves one booth with 1000 voters and so it would take 10 elections i.e. at least 10 years for 1 EVM to equate corresponding paper costs. Plus, since EVMs are fragile, transporting them is more expensive. And EVMs need to be stored, and so there is storage costs. EVMs need to be checked 2-4 times before election and 2-4 times during two elections. Plus, some maintainence and repairs are occasionally needed. It reduces counting time, but counting time is small cost of election. The real cost is field cost - sending people, cars etc in field. So EVMs cost more than paper, and worse, EVMs are riggable at industrial scale in unprovable ways by cable swapping if the guys at top decide to do so.

Friday, May 22, 2009

29. Result and conclusion from my contesting Loksabha 2009 election and its campaign

As you know, I was contesting Lok Sabha 2009 election in Gandhinagar Constituency. I got 7309 votes out of 791,000 votes, about 1% of total. I was forth rank, the third candidate Mallikaben Sarabhait got 9300 votes, about 2000 votes more than I got. Here are the results.

http://ibnlive.in.com/politics/electionresults/constituency/6/06/gandhinagar.html

Now allow me to make a bold statement : 7300 votes means over 60000 to 70000 liked the laws I had proposed. Some 60000 to 70000 liked the proposals, but some 53,000 to 63,000 did not want Congress to win and so they still voted for BJP (or other way). Or they did not trust me because I was contesting for the first time and I am unknown fellow.

And given that mere 100,000 voters saw the newspaper advertisements and barely 20000 got my pamphlets, 70,000 people liking my proposal is a big success for the agenda !!

Allow me to explain why I think some 70,000 people liked my proposals.

About my background and campaign

Out of 7300 voters who voted for me, barely 300 knew me by my name or face. Why only 300? Well, consider my background :

1. I am a mere software developer and have to spend at least 20-30 hours a week earning living. Some 30-40 hours a week I spend in reading about administrative systems in India, world and discussing changes I want. So no time to socialize.

2. I do zero social work, zero patronizing.

3. I do no charity work.

4. I do not take ANY Govt grants.

5. I have zero caste/ethnic base in Ahmedabad. I am Jain, and how many Jains possibily voted for me for my being a Jain? Well, not even 500 Jains in Ahmedabad know that I am a Jain !! Because I havent visited any Derasar in past 25 years !!

6. I have never been a corporator etc that would give me some local base.

7. My political career in field is 6-7 years old, but does NOT go beyond distributing pamphlets and giving talks on laws I am proposing.

8. I did not raise any local issue like roads or streets or traffic or water supply. Parliament is for National issues only.

9. I had made zero emotional appeal in my talks, pamphlets and newspaper ads

10. I made NO pseudo-talks like secularism, environmentalism, women issues, dalit issues, minority issues, student issues etc. These pseudo-talks does attract urbane liberal DCH youth. And raising "women issues" does attract some women voters. But I left all that pseudo-giri to Mallikaben. I did not want any votes from shrills.

11. My advertisements talks only of real issues like solutions to reduce poverty, improve Military, reduce corruption etc. No BJP bashing, no Congress bashing, no LKA bashing, no Modi bashing, no SG/RG bashing, no MMS bashing.

12. My advertisements were 100% rational-legal and looked more like a good newspaper column text rather than some emotive ad.

13. I had NO slogan --- I hate slogans.

14. All my neighbors fall in different constituency - Ahmedabad West. So no neighbor's votes.

I believe that 100% voters are rational and so no emotive appeals and entertainment is needed and it will only be counter-productive. The voters take wrong choice ONLY because of lack of information and lack of good options. So a candidate who wishes well for nation should confine to creating good options and informing voters about good option. So I wanted a dry campaign with no entertainment elements. No road shows. No mass meetings. No rikshaw or cars with mikes making noise all over. Only advertisements, pamphlets and talks. The pamphlets were all black and white, so were all advertisements. With no glossy emotive pcitures.

I did ALL administrative work myself. I myself went to Gandhinagar to collect form. I filled the entire form myself -- hired no lawyer. I spent over 30-40 hours in just filling forms. I did not appoint even an election agent. And candidate needs to submit expense details 4 times during election. All 4 times, I went myself in person autorickshaw from Ahmedabad to Gandhinagar - I did not ask my volunteer to go to do this brain dead work. All pamphlets and advertisements were drafted by me and me only. I had no polling agent. I had no counting agent. India needs to get of all this army of peons.

And when I started, I had only 50 activists all unpaid and part-time . I dont believed in paid activism. (Now I have 200, all unpaid and part-time)

My advertisement expenses of 5 advertisements I gave before election and 4 advertisements I gave during election period was about Rs 800,000. Pamphlets cost me Rs 90,000 and rest was mere Rs 50000. Everything was post-tax hard earned white money. I did NOT take a penny of donation, I believe in "activists' contribution" only and I hate donations=bheekh.

Mine was a 100% no-drama "confine to laws you propose" campaign.

----

About Gandhinagar-Ahmedabad area : independents nightmare

Before I filed form, I had seen EC website and got details of these two area's voting behavior. Since 1992, no independent or small party got over 10000 votes. Not even one. And since 1992 till date, hardly 6 independents got over 5000 votes. The reason is very logical - Congress and BJP invoke deep fear in OR a lone hope against that fear. So no matter how good independent is, he seldom gets past 5000 votes. Why?

1. over 99% Congress haters think : if I vote for X, he is bound to loose, and Congress may win

2. over 99% BJP haters think : if I vote for X, he is bound to loose, and BJP may win

So while over 90% voters in Ahmedabad-Gandhinagar hate both BJP/Congress and have respect for none, they still vote for them lest the guy they hate more would win. This is called as Two Party Syndrome, where people vote "most powerful and second worst guy". This is a desperate attempt to minimize losses and nothing more. [Aside : The problem is 2000 years old, and solution is also 2000 years old -- a voting system where a voter can cast 5 preferences. Too complicated? Well, Ireland, Australia have been using this for over 50-70 years !! So how complex can it be? But till that change comes, 2 party symdrome is here to stay as the problem is real as long as voters are forced to confine to single choice only.]

So when can an independent get some votes in Ahmedabad-Gandhinagar?

1. Personal contacts
2. Local issues
3. Caste base - a small sub-caste feels injustice and so rallies for their independent candidate
4. Neighbors OR
5. When some voters like independents views to such an extent, that voter says : hell with both, I would vote for this guy.

-------------------

So who voted for me

As I explained, that reasons 1-4 do only apply on me. I have no caste base, I do no charity work, I have no widespread contacts etc. So only reason why someone would vote for me

So out of 7300, only 300 voted for me because they knew me well. But why did rest 7000 voted for me? The only sensible explanation can be : because they liked the laws I proposed. IOW, 7000 guys had intense attachment for this agenda. But if 7000 guys had such intense attachment that two pary syndrome broke, then how many people liked the proposals? I would guess at least 8 to 10 times more - about 70000. And since my advertisements reached only 100,000 people, this was a good "conversions" ratio. So IMO," Right To Recall" laws have made a deep impact in the minds of voters of Ahmedabad.

-------------

Now you want Right to Recall laws in India?

If yes, pls follow this blog mehtarahulc.blogspot.com and join this orkut community http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Community.aspx?cmm=21780619

Sunday, March 29, 2009

28. Exact drafts of all the laws are proposing

.

This webpage has list and details of all the drafts we are proposing

http://rahulmehta.com/all_drafts.htm

.

27. MRCM proposals to improve law-making

.

27.1 The problem and solutions in short

There are two basic problems with law-making as of now

First problem : MPs do not make laws we citizens want. eg MPs refused to enact laws that we commons want to obtain land rent.
Second problem : MPs make laws that citizens dont want. eg 498A , DVA laws etc

Following are our demands , promises to solve these two problems

The second MRCM EN would enable citizens to issue Govt Ordinances and thus second EN solves first problem to a considerable extent
We are proposing a procedure by which citizen can register effective YES/NO in the Parliament by paying Rs 3 fee at Talati’s office. This will further reduce first problem I cited above
We demand , promise a Jury System over law made by Parliament to deal with second problem.
We propose citizens’ review system to reduce second problem.

Above are our proposals at National level. We have similar proposals at State levels as well.

27.2 MRCM Party’s demand , promise to register citizens’ YES/NO in Parliament

Following is the Govt Ordinance we demand :

Any citizen can inward the text of a Bill in the PM's office and obtain an inward number.
Any citizen can go to the Talati, show his ID, pay Rs. 3 fee and register his YES/NO on any of the suggested bills. The clerk will give receipt for his YES/NO. The citizen can change his YES/NO any day. The YES/NO will be published on the internet and notice boards. (Please note that there is no confidentiality).
An MP can register his YES/NO before the Speaker. If the MP does not register YES/NO, it would be counted as NO.
The MP's vote will count for those, all those, but ONLY those who have NOT registered their YES/NO on that bill.
Example: Suppose an area 50000 voters where say 15000 (30%) voted YES, 5000 (10%) votes NO and 30000 (60%) did not cast their vote on the proposal. In that case, the Speaker will consider MP’s weight as (100% - 30% - 10%) = 60%. Now say that the MP votes YES. Then that area’s YES-fraction will be 30% + 60% = 90% and NO-fraction will be 10%. If the MP votes NO, then that area’s YES fraction be 30% and NO-fraction will be 60% + 10% = 70%.
The Speaker will add the YES and NO fractions of each ward
If the sum of YES-fractions is over 50% within 60 days, the Loksabha Speaker will send the bill to the Rajyasabha Speaker. If the proposal does not gather 50% support within 60 days after issue of inward number, the Loksabha Speaker will declare the proposal as failed.
The Rajyasabha Speaker will let Rajyasabha MPs register their YES/NO starting the day bill gets inward number. If an MP does not register his vote, it will be taken as a NO.
The Speaker of Rajyasabha will calculate the YES-fraction and NO-fraction of the bill as follow :

say a state has K MPs
say that state has T voters of which Y voted YES and N voted no, and (T – Y – N) did not register their YES or NO
then each MPs’ of that state’s vote will be (T – Y – N)/K.

If passed, it shall have the same weight as Bill passed by the Parliament

The above mentioned procedure will enable citizens to enact the law they want.

27.3 Draft to implement the above law

#	Procedure for	Procedure / instruction
1	-	The word citizen would mean a registered voter
2	Cabinet Secretary (Center)	The Cabinet Secretary will accept a proposal for enacting a law from any citizen for a fee of Rs 200 plus Rs 200 per page (of size no larger than A4) and issue a serial number to the proposal.
3	Talati , (or Talati’s Clerks)	In next 90 days after a proposal for change is registered by Cabinet Secretary, the Talati/clerks will allow the citizens to register their YES/NO on the Bill. The clerk will take following things from the citizen : a)Rs 3/- fee b)citizen's ID c)Bill’s serial number d)his YES or NO preference. The clerk will then make the entries in the computer and will give a computer generated receipt to the citizen.
4	Talati	The Talati, for a fee of Rs 3, will allow the citizen to change his YES/NO.
5	Talati	The Talati will post the names, serial numbers etc of the citizens who have registered their YES/NO on the internet.
6	Cabinet Secretary	The Cabinet Secretary will publish Constituency wise YES/NO counts of each Constituency for each of proposals every Monday and on the 90th day after proposal was submitted.
7	Speakers (Loksabha, Rajyasabha)	The Speakers will allow MPs to register total or partial YES/NO. If an MP does NOT register YES/NO, the Speakers will count his vote as total NO.
8	Loksabha Speaker	The Speaker will calculate the YES-fraction and NO-fraction every Loksabha constituency as follows : T = Total No. of voters in that constituency. Y = No. of voters who voted YES, so citizens' YES-fraction = Y/T N = Number of voters who voted NO, so citizens' NO-fraction = N/T M = No. of voters who did not vote on the Bill = T - Y - N if MP votes YES, then YES-fraction will be (Y+M)/T and NO-fraction will be N/T if MP votes NO, then YES-fraction will be Y/T and NO-fraction will be (N+M)/T. if MP abstains, then YES-fraction will be Y/T and NO-fraction will be N/T.
9	Loksabha Speaker	The Speaker will add YES-fractions and NO-fractions of all the Loksabha constituency to obtain the total YES fraction of the State.
10	Loksabha Speaker	The Speaker will declare bill as "failed if NO-fraction exceeds YES-fraction. if YES-fraction is larger than NO-fraction then the Speaker will send the bill to the Rajyasabha Speaker
11	Rajyasabha Speaker	Within 30 days after a bill has been presented, a member of Rajyasabha can register his YES/NO on the bill before the Speaker. If a member does NOT register his YES/NO, the Speaker will take it as a NO.
12	Rajyasabha Speaker	Speaker will use following formula to calculate the YES fraction and NO fraction Y = Number of voters in India who voted YES N = Number of voters in India who voted NO T = Total number of citizen-voters in India U = Number of citizens who didn’t vote = T - Y - N MY = Number of Rajyasabha members who voted YES MN = Number of Rajyasabha members who voted NO (or did not register their vote) MT = Total number of Members Then YES fraction = Y/T + MY/MTU/T NO fraction = N/T + MN/MTU/T
13	Rajyasabha Speaker	If the YES fraction exceeds NO fraction, Speaker will declare the bill as passed, else he will declare the bill as failed.

27.4 MRCM Party’s demand , promise to enact Jury System over Laws made by MPs

Due to bribery, and no other reasons, the MPs have been enacting laws like SEZ act, 498A, DVA etc. How can citizens top this mess? The third proposal enables citizens to cancel any unconstitutional law that MPs have made. But that will be after they have passed this law. How can citizens stop wrong laws to begin with? Well, the following law will reduce this possibility :

After the law is passed by Parliament, the PM shall send the copy of law in English and State’s official languages to each Tahsildar of India
Each Tahsildar will summon 30 citizen voters each from the voter list as Jurors.
Each of the 30 citizens can suggest one speaker. Ten of these 30 suggested speakers will be chosen at random. The 10 suggested speakers or their representative will give 1 hr speech on the law passed.
The MP who drafted and proposed the law can send one or more representatives who shall have the total speech time of 3 hours.
Each Juror can ask speak for 30 minutes in which he may make a speech or ask questions to any of the persons who has given the speeches on the law passed.
Each day, the proceedings will start at 10.30 AM and will go on till 6.30 PM with 2.00 PM to 2.30 PM as lunch break. So proceedings will last for no more than 6 days.
At the end of 3rd day, the Jurors will specify their YES/NO on the laws passed.
If over 16 out of 30 Jurors say NO or “no option”, the Tahsildar will mark the law as rejected.
If majority of the Tahsil Juries in India reject the law, the PM will declare the law as rejected.

There are 6000 wards and Tahsils in India. So some 6000 * 30 = 180,000 citizens YES/NO will taken on the law passed. Given that time is just 3 days, this is a fairly large sample which is difficult to bribe out. Hence, this sample will be an effective check on the Parliament. Each Juror will get say Rs 100 and so cost is Rs 1.8 crore plus other costs (such as salary of Tahsildar who will conduct the hearings etc). The total cost will be about Rs 5 crore per law Parliament passes. The Parliament passes some 100 laws a year. So total cost will be Rs 500 cr per year of so. This is tiny compared to damage one wrong law can cause. Using such mechanism, it becomes easier for citizens to ensure that SEZ, 498A, DVA etc like laws do not come up.

27.6 Other party’s stand on this issues

The MPs of other party such as Congress, BJP, CPM etc have flatly told citizens --- citizens cannot register their YES/NO in Parliament. we request citizens and non-80G-activists not to vote and campaign for these corrupt leaders.

.

26. Improvement in civil laws we demand

.

26.1 Summary of changes in civil laws we demand , promise

We have demanded, proposed, 10s of detailed changes in civil laws. Some of them are

Enacting Land Record System (Torrance System)
Enacting administrative system to record all loans and restrict usury
Enacting administrative changes to settle loan default cases
Speedy divorce, alimony and child custody to abused women
Repealing 498A, DVA
Enacting administrative changes settle inheritance related disputes fairly

26.2 Enacting land/flat ownership record system

We request the reader to gather information on Torrens Title . We demand , promise to enact this system in India to resolve the mess in the land record system.

26.3 Laws to stop usury and solve loan defaults

The procedure to enact system by which citizens can replace police chiefs, and also enact Jury System over junior policemen. This will reduce the strength of nexuses between users and policemen. In addition, we will enforce every lender to disclose the loans he has given and disclose the interest he is charging, and stop the usury by enabling Jurors to imprison the users. The ceiling on interest will be 1.5 times the prime lending rate. (eg as of Jun-2008, PLR is 1.25% a month, and so limit on private lending will be 2.5% a month).

26.4 Laws to fix family disputes

We shall codify marital contracts and make them valid unless one-sided. Fair Minimal Alimony and child custody shall be married woman’s right upon separation or divorce. In addition, if the woman is facing abuses, we shall empower the Jurors to give prompt divorce with alimony and child custody.
We promise to repeal one-sided laws like 498A and DVA.

26.5 Other party’s stand

No party is interested in repealing 498A and have supported DVA.

26.6 Details

Details will be soon posted on this web-page.

26. Improving Changes in civil laws we demand , promise

Contents

1. Summary of changes in civil laws we demand , promise
2. Enacting land/flat ownership record system
3. Laws to stop usury and solve loan defaults
4. Laws to fix family disputes
5. Other party’s stand
6. Details

1. Summary of changes in civil laws we demand , promise

We have demanded, proposed, 10s of detailed changes in civil laws. Some of them are

1. Enacting Land Record System (Torrance System)
2. Enacting administrative system to record all loans and restrict usury
3. Enacting administrative changes to settle loan default cases
4. Speedy divorce, alimony and child custody to abused women
5. Repealing 498A, DVA
6. Enacting administrative changes settle inheritance related disputes fairly

2. Enacting land/flat ownership record system

We request the reader to gather information on Torrens Title . We demand , promise to enact this system in India to resolve the mess in the land record system.

3. Laws to stop usury and solve loan defaults

The procedure to enact system by which citizens can replace police chiefs, and also enact Jury System over junior policemen. This will reduce the strength of nexuses between users and policemen. In addition, we will enforce every lender to disclose the loans he has given and disclose the interest he is charging, and stop the usury by enabling Jurors to imprison the users. The ceiling on interest will be 1.5 times the prime lending rate. (eg as of Jun-2008, PLR is 1.25% a month, and so limit on private lending will be 2.5% a month).

4. Laws to fix family disputes

We shall codify marital contracts and make them valid unless one-sided. Fair Minimal Alimony and child custody shall be married woman’s right upon separation or divorce. In addition, if the woman is facing abuses, we shall empower the Jurors to give prompt divorce with alimony and child custody.
We promise to repeal one-sided laws like 498A and DVA.

5. Other party’s stand

No party is interested in repealing 498A and have supported DVA.

6. Details

Details will be soon posted on this web-page.

Main Page Feedback? MehtaRahulC@yahoo.com Orkut Community For Discussions

25. Decreasing reservation with the support of poor SC, ST and OBCs

.

25.1 First modification : giving higher preference to more backward

The communities which have lesser representation in administration will get more seats till their representation is at the same level. For this we need a complete caste census and details are given later.

25.2 Second modification : the system of economic-choice , social choice

What makes us different from all parties is that we support an administrative system, called as economic-preference as opposed to social preference to reduce demand for reservation in SC, ST and OBCs. Following is the summary of the system of second-choice for Dalits, OBCs

Any member of a sub-caste that belongs to ST, SC or OBC can walk to Tahsildar’s office, undergo verification and apply for economic-choice , where in

he shall still retain his SC, ST, OBC status
he shall receive inflation adjusted Rs 100 per month, till he cancels economic-choice
he will be eligible for reservation moment he cancels his economic-choice
the number of reserved seats will decrease by 50% of those who opt for economic-choice
the money shall come from tax on commercial , residential, industrial land and nowhere else

Example : India has 100 cr of population of which 14% i.e. 14 cr are SC. So if a college has 1000 seats of then 140 are reserved . Now suppose out of these 14 cr SCs, say 6 cr insist on economic-choice then each shall get payment of Rs 100 a month and reservation for SC will go down by 14*0.66*6/14 = 3.9% i.e. will become about 9.1%.

Most poor Dalits did not get much benefit from Reservation, and as elite in Dalits increases in size, the opportunities for poor dalits further reduces. The economic-choice creates a system by which the poor left out dalits can also get benefit of the reservation as well. Many of them would opt for economic-choice as (opposed to social-choice that reservation offers). This will reduce reservation

25.3 Other steps to reduce demand for reservation

Reducing casteism in courts : The demand for reservation is high, as there is intense nepotism , casteism in courts. Due to rampant nepotism , casteism, commons of Dalits , OBCs also feel desire to have “their own” men in courts etc. The laws we have proposed to improve courts reduce casteism , nepotism in courts and will thus reduce the demand for reservation in Dalits, OBCs etc. The decrease in corruption in courts will also decrease demand in Dalit, OBC youth to become judges.
Reducing corruption, atrocities in police : The demand for reservation is high, as there is intense corruption and atrocities in policemen. Due to rampant corruption and high handedness, members Dalits and OBCs also feel desire to have “their own” men in police etc. The laws we have proposed to improve police reduce corruption in police as well as atrocities. This will reduce the demand for caste based reservation in Dalits, OBCs etc. The decrease in corruption in courts will also decrease demand in Dalit, OBC youth to become policemen and will reduce intensity of demand for caste based reservation in police.
Reducing corruption in administration : Due to rampant corruption and high handedness, members Dalits and OBCs also feel desire to have “their own” men in administration etc. The laws we have proposed to improve police reduce corruption and arbitrariness in administration. This will reduce the demand for caste based reservation in Dalits, OBCs etc. This will also decrease desire in educated. The decrease in corruption in courts will also decrease demand in Dalit, OBC youth to become policemen and will reduce intensity of demand for caste based reservation in police.
English education : The education in English is lower in Dalit, OBCs due to upper caste intellectuals’ decision to discourage English education in Govt schools as far as possible. Many upper caste who were well off sent their kids to English schools or other local language schools, but at least English was taught properly. As a result, OBC, Dalits get less score in many subjects where preparation material is English. Once universal English education is implemented, the scores of Dalits, OBCs will reduce and this will reduce demand for reservation.

25.4 Over all stand on reservation

MRCM’s forth demand-cum-promise will substantially reduce poverty. And the changes we propose in education will further reduce poverty and economic gap between dalits and upper castes. And the changes we propose in religious charities will reduce the discrimination they face in temples, and with that social discrimination shall also reduce. We demand and promise to end ALL interviews at the level of initial recruitment in Police, Govt, banks, RBI, SBI, judiciary, Govt lawyer and so forth, and this will also reduce the discrimination Dalits face in recruitment. So the % score gap between closing rank general and reserved categories would reduce day by day.
But as of now, we support Caste based Reservation. We believe in reducing the strife by increasing education in dalits so that % gap in closing rank decreases, and by reducing demand for reservation in dalits using the proposed system of economic-choice.
In addition, we propose following modification in reservation

No reservation for Dalits, Tribals and OBCs who are not Hindu, Buddhists or Sikh. To be specific, no reservation for Dalits, Tribals, OBCs in Muslims, Christians etc.
The Dalit, Tribal or OBC if applicable for reservation, will have to first apply in their respective quota and only after their quota is filled, can they apply in general quota
No reservation on any other basis, including religion, economic or social
Create a system of economic-choice to reduce demand for reservation
Ensure that backward amongst backward get benefits using sub-quota or other means

These are our broad proposals. The next section gives details.

25.5 Details of administrative changes we promise on reservation issue

Economic-Choice System

Any member of a sub-caste that belongs to ST, SC or OBC can walk to Tahsildar’s office, undergo verification and apply for economic-choice , where in

he shall still retain his SC, ST, OBC status
he shall receive inflation adjusted Rs 150 per month, till he cancels economic-choice
till he gets this payment, he cannot apply in reserved quota.
he will be eligible for reservation the day he cancels his second-choice
the number of reserved seats will decrease depending on number of those who have opted-out
the money shall come from tax on commercial , residential, industrial land and nowhere else.

Example : India has 100 cr of population of which 14% i.e. 14 cr are SC. So if a college has 1000 seats of then 140 are reserved . Now suppose out of these 14 cr SCs, say 6 cr insist on economic-choice then each shall get payment of Rs 100 a month and reservation for SC will go down by 14*0.66*6/14 = 5.94% i.e. will become 8.06% IOW, if every SC were to take economic choice, the reservation would become 1/3 of what it is now. The reservation will be across ran and file of administration, from Supreme Court to peons
If a person has opted for economic-choice and then changes to social-choice, he will be entitled for CBR benefits on that day. But if he reverts back to economic choice, he shall get Rs 100/mo payment after 6 months
If a person is Dalit, OBC has opted for economic-choice, he can still obtain seat on quota, but shall become eligible after he cancels economic-choice
If a person has taken any seat on SC/ST or OBC quota, he will not be eligible for economic-choice
The Rs 100/mo payment will come for a child below 18 only if both parents opt for economic-choice
If both parents have opted for economic-choice, their children shall get Rs 200/mo for at most (2 sons) or (2 sons, 1 daughter).

Caste census

Conduct a full wealth and sub-caste census : Caste strife is a reality. It cannot vanish by hiding it and it cant be dealt administratively if it is hidden. To properly deal with any issue, administration needs crystal clear information. So we propose to take sub-caste census where in sub-caste of each person along with position he holds in Govt, PSU and market value of land/assets he owns will be noted. The census will improve with National-ID system and an accurate system with less than 1% inaccuracy can be built in 2-4 years. But an approximate system can be built in 6 months. We shall start with the inaccurate system and increase the accuracy every day.
There are about 200 sub-castes in India, but since social situation between a caste in one state and analogous caste in another state may be different, they become different caste in the National list. So the National List has about 5000 castes, while most States’ Lists have about 200-400 sub-castes. So the census will note which of the 5000 state-wise sub-caste the person belongs to. Please note – sub-castes will be state-wise only.
If a person claims to general, then he need not specify caste or sub-caste and shall not get any benefit of reservation. But if a person or his father has taken benefit of reservation, then he must specify the caste, state and sub-caste he belongs to.
Using person-caste-wealth data, PM can obtain per capita wealth of sub-caste.
Political Wellness Index : The Political Index of a caste will be calculated as follows

Position Points

Position	Points
PM, Supreme Court judge, HC-Cj, Regulators in Central Govt , RBI Gov, RBI Deputy Gov, Bank Chairman	50,00,000 points
High Court judges, Principal Session judges, Dept Secretaries in Central Govt, regulators in State Govt, CM	40,00,000 points
Sessions judges, Ministers in Center	10,00,000 points
Other lower court judges, Ministers in State	5,00,000 points
MP, officers above Under Secretaries	1,00,000 points
MLA , District Panchayat Sarpanch	15,000 points
All class-I officers in Central, State Govt, Police etc (not PSUs)	20,000 points
All class-II officers in Central, State Govt, Police , etc	10,000 points
All class-III officers in Central, State Govt, Police etc	5,000 points
All employees in PSUs, Central Govt, State Govt etc (including above)	Annual Basic Salary divided by 100
Person with 10,00,000 times the per capita wealth	100,00,000 points
Person with 1,00,000 times the per capita wealth	10,00,000 points
Person with 10,000 times the per capita wealth	1,00,000 points
Person with 1000 times the per capita wealth	10,000 points
Person with 100 times the per capita wealth	1,000 points

The castes with lower points would get more seats within their quota. The details will be provided on this webpage later.

25.6 Some rough idea of economic choice

Hypothetically, if entire 60cr of SC, ST and OBC population were to go on economic choice, then the quota would reduce from 50% to 50%/4 = about 12.5% and costs will be Rs 1200 * 60 = Rs 72,000cr a year. But that is an extreme scenario.

25.7 Against some anti-reservationists, who are hypocrites

We oppose the upper caste anti-reservation activists who oppose reservation on the basis of merit, and then shamelessly support laws that promote nepotism in judge, promote self finance colleges where merit is not even asked for and promote interview system which upper caste have been using to filter out dalits. We strongly and intensely hate the intellectuals and activists who have supported pro-nepotism , anti-Dalit laws and then opposed reservation by using excuse of merit. IMO, they are hypocrites not worth talking to. We are open to debate on reservation and explain why we support reservation, but with only those adversaries who can give in writing that they oppose the following laws 1. judge shall appoint judges. 2. judges shall give judgments and not Jurors 3. interviews in judiciary and administration.

25.8 Against some pro-reservationists, who are also hypocrites

There are those who oppose reservation, and support nepotism in courts and administration. I call them anti-reservation hypocrites. And then there are those elite SC, ST and OBCs who insist on en-cashing on the plight of poor OBCs, SCs, STs etc . We oppose hypocrites of this categories as well.

.

24. Removing Govt Control over Temples and other places of worship

.

Within one year, we promise to enact National/State-level Community Temple Trusts along the line of SGPC for all communities, sects and hand them over all the temples currently under Govt. The heads of the trusts will be replaceable by the members, and the membership will be via birth or conversion and acceptance. The heads will not be hereditary or appointed by any foreign power such as Vatican.

We at MRCM also promise to give plots of Ram Janam Bhoomi, Kashi Vishwanath and Krishna Janam Bhoomi plots to the National Hindu Temple Community Trusts, whose head will be repleceable in one year using YESes of citizens. It has been proven again and again that Muslims had no objection against the 3 plots demanded by Hindus. The problem has worsened because Muslims were worried about BJP increasing the number from 3 to 3000 or 30,000. Essentially, it was Muslims’ lack in faith in BJP which has created the deadlock, not lack of Muslims’ faith in Hindus. The Muslims do not have faith in BJP MPs (neither do Hindus for that matter), but Muslims do have faith in Hindus as a whole. Hence if the law says that transfer of plot would need approval of 51% of citizens, it is ensured that Hindus will confine the demand to the three plots. This will resolve the 17 year old problem for once and for all and restore the communal peace in India.

The details will be provided on this webpage later.

.

23. Changes in administration to solve JK problem

.

The administrative change to solve JK problem is as follows: using 3rd suggested change (wherein citizens can register YES/NO in Parliament), we citizens should enact following changes

Request JK MLAs to ask Parliament to repeal Art-370
Merge JK with Uttaranchal and Himachal Pradesh
Enact law that would enable any Indian citizen to lease lands in JK for 25 years
Encourage retired Military and retired Policemen from all over India to settle into Kashmir areas

.
We shall later describe the details on this web-page.

22. MRCM proposals to reduce Bangladeshies' inflow, expel them

.

22.1 The problem of Bangladeshi infiltration

The whole North East may get seceded and lakhs of Indians may be killed (like 1947) if Bangladeshies keep coming.

22.2 Stand of other Political Parties on Bangladeshi infiltration

Most parties such as Congress, BJP and CPM have decided to nothing to stop Bangladeshi illegal immigrants. The Congress in its 45+ years of rule and BJP in its 7 years of rule did not even enact ID system to reduce this problem. I request every supporter of Congress, BJP and CPM to realize that if when North East becomes part of Bangladesh and lakhs of Indians get massacred like 1947, their voting for these corrupt neta was one factor.

We demand , promise to enact Person-ID system coupled with “Employee and payment disclosure law” . In one year, these two laws will reduce the new infiltration to 1% of what it is now. And we demand , promise to enact Jury based Tribunals to decide citizenship issue for existing infiltrators. Once illegal immigrants land in prison, they will stop coming.

22.3 The useless of the fence solution

The BJP, Congress and CPM leaders are misguiding citizens by showing the fence they are creating. We support the fence and we shall continue it ; but we want citizens to note that fence cannot reduce infiltration even by 1%. Please allow us to mention a joke to make this point clear

A review committee appointed by Railway Minister to decrease fatality in accidents said that in most accidents, most fatalities are in first two and last two compartments. So to decrease fatalities, this Review Committee of Experts insists that the first two and last two compartments should be moved into middle !!

This joke will explain the futility of the 1000 km long fence. Today, Bangladeshies are using land rather than sea coast to come into India as land option is cheaper. But coming from coast line i also easy and not all that expensive. So once the land is fenced, Bangladeshies will use coast line to enter into India !! Now are we going to build fence along whole coast line of India or even West Bengal? We cant. So even after fence is made, illegal immigration will not reduce even by 1%
And consider the countries who have drastically reduced the problem of illegal immigration such as Canada, Sweden, Norway, Germany, Australia, New Zealand etc. The way these Western countries have solved this problem is via punishing the employers who give employment to illegals. US Govt wants illegal immigration to come to keep cost low and so US Govt has not made any law to punish employers who hire illegals. But US can afford illegal immigration as illegal immigrants do not pose any security or secessionist threats and provide economic benefits. But the countries that do not want illegal immigrants like Canada, Germany etc have made laws that require employers to disclose employee’s IDs and punish employers who hide this information. This disables organized employers from hiring illegal employees and reduces illegal immigration.

22.4 MRCM demands , promises to reduce Bangladeshies inflow , expel them

Enact National Person-ID , Citizen ID system
Enact Govt Order that employers will be required to report Person-ID of all employees
Enact Jury System to imprison an employer if he hid the information about illegal employees he had
Jury Trials to decide whether a person accused is citizen or illegal immigrant

We have discussed the first (3) proposals before. Next section has details of 4th proposal.

22.5 Building Family Trees using DNA data

Lets say as on Jan-1 of year XXXX everyone’s DNA data of every person over 3 months old is in the system. Now each person can be asked to give IDs of his relatives, and using DNA data, the relations can be verified to a considerable extent as parent-child has 50% DNA in common, siblings with same both parents have over 50% DNA in common, with one parent same have 25% DNA in common, grand child and grand parent have 25% in common, cousins have about 25% DNA in common and so forth. Using this, number of blood relatives a person can be established. Higher the number of blood relatives he has, lesser are the chances the that he is immigrant. And thus using blood relative information validated or invalidated by DNA data, many illegal Bangladeshies who have just zero or few blood relatives can be easily identified out.

22.6 Jury System to decide citizenship

In first year, Govt will create Person-ID system
The Register shall make CDs of Person-ID database of every male (and later females) with name, Person-ID, photo, address etc and sell it at cost.
Any person can cite names of 10 person whom he thinks are non-citizens after paying Rs 3 fee.
From the names received, the Registrar shall order the accused in the order of number of complaints received against him of being non-citizen.
The Registrar shall notify all the relatives of the person accused
For every complaint he receives, the Registrar shall form a National Jury consisting of 12 citizens chosen India and State Jury consisting of 12 citizens chosen from the State.
Any person who is blood relative of accused can cite that the person is wrongly accused after citing his relation.
The Jurors will listen to the person using video phones and also the relatives. The accused and his relatives may be asked to appear in the trial. Each Juror can ask him questions for 30 minutes.
If over 9 out of 12 Jurors in either of the Juries dismiss the case as frivolous case, the Registrar shall not try the person against at least 10 citizens file complaint against him once again. After two trials the number of persons required to complaint against him will be 100 and after 3 trials, no complaint will be filed against him for 5 years.
If the complain is dismissed as frivolous, the complainer’s right to file complain will go down by one.
If over 9 out 12 Jurors in both Juries declare the accused as non-citizen, the Registrar will call one more National and one more State Jury. If the Juries give same decision, the Registrar will mark him as non-citizen, imprison him and start process to expel him out of India.
If less than 10 out 12 Jurors in any Juries, but more 8 out of 12 in any one Jury declare the accused as non-citizen, the Registrar will let the accused stay in India, but not in North East or West Bengal. This clause is essential to reduce concentration of the Bangladeshies in North East

22.7 Stand of other parties’ leaders

Other parties such as Congress, CPM, BJP are least interested in even stopping Bangladeshies forget expelling them. We request citizens not to vote for these parties.

21. MRCM proposals to save the Hindus of Bangladesh

The MRCM Party demands , promises to enact Govt Orders necessary to bring Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan into India. The proposal is viable and does not go against Secularism. The window will be open for 10 years.

In 1947, the Hindus of India, against their wish, accepted that Pakistan (with Bangladesh) will be Muslim State which clearly meant that Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh will have no place there. This automatically gave rights to Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh over India. The window to enter into India was closed without notice and without informing them. Hence we must open that window for Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh , and close say after 10 years after fully informing them.

The secularism in Constitution restricts Govt of India inside India . So if GoI places a notice in Bangladesh that “Hindus will be given residency in India”, then it does not violate Constitution as no person in Bangladesh can file any complaint against GoI in Supreme Court of India, as the persons in Bangladesh have no Constitutional rights over GoI. So our MRCM Party’s demand and promise to let Hindus , and not Muslims, of Bangladesh and Pakistan enter into India and get residency , work permit and later citizenship does not violate Constitution of India.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

20. Enacting Person-ID System, Citizen-ID system

.

20.1 Lack of ID-system

So rotten are our officers and Ministers, that are our all existing ID systems, ration card, election card, PAN-ID etc are so defunct that many citizens have lost faith that an “ID system” can be built. To make matter worse, the intellectuals have sworn not to inform citizens about ID systems, and so many people still believe that ID system just means “issuing a card” , which is not the case (the important part in an ID system is an entry into Govt CDs --- not the card which can be easily forged.) . And the intellectuals keep misleading people by saying lies like : “ US has ID system --- they haven’t been able to stop illegals" . I shall later refute that lie.

What is ID –system? ID-system is NOT card – the card is tiny part of it. An ID system is a system where-in records of citizens , other persons, companies etc are obtained accurately. A foolproof ID-system is trivially possible, and is highly inexpensive on per capita basis. And the ID-system trivially solves many problems

If Person-ID system combined with a law that “employer must report employee’s ID, finger print, photo” can reduce infiltration of Bangladeshies to less than 1% of what is now
can eliminate be-naami land holdings
can reduce tax evasions
can reduce cost of record keeping every Govt dept
eases the task of tracking suspects and thus reduce policing costs
the DNA database is extremely useful in tracking rapists and many other criminals

And there are 10s of major benefits. For India, if ID system and law to “report every employee” is not enacted, then population of Bangladeshies will increase in North East to a point that NE will become part of Bangladesh and cores of Indians in NE will be killed the way they were killed in 1947.

The MRCM party promises to create Person-ID system within one year, and a Citizen-ID system in 3 years. The drafts of Govt Orders needed to enact the Person-ID system and Citizen-ID system is given in this Manifesto.

20.2 Expectations from a Citizen-ID system

This book is our Manifesto. We really did not prefer to describe what ID system means. But sadly, intellectuals of India are so intensely against giving information about ID system to us commons, that most of us do not even know what ID system means and what it can do.

A Citizen-ID system is a system which enables a community and a govt officer to ensure that a particular person is “one of us”, he is whom he says and he is same as one described in the Govt records. Following are some of the issues related to an ID-system

ID number must not change for life
ID number should be unique nation wide
Every citizen must have ID, and non-citizen should have different type of ID
The citizen must get a serial number as soon as he applies. And it is possible to cut the delay to say 15 minutes, rather than days
It should be possible to fix the errors in Govt records within minutes.
A citizen must be able to get a new ID card if his original one is lost within hours
There should be sufficient details on the card so that it is possible and easy for an officer to ensure that the person holding the ID card is same as the person in the card.

The modern technology has solved these problems some 20 to 30 years ago. And today, they have been solved to the level of triviality. How? Consider finger print. By scanning finger prints in computer, the identity of a person can be checked. Now say in a population of 10 lakh say some 1000 citizens have fraudulently obtained two different ID cards. Then by comparing the finger prints, the modern computers can detect over 95% of these duplicates within hours. Also, a person can be required to submit blood group details such as ABO, +/-, MN, K etc factors. Basically, there some two dozen factors in human blood which makes blood group of a person “nearly” unique. If same person has obtained two different ID numbers, his blood group details on the cards will be same, and a computer by detecting duplicates can catch him. And once the system gets funding to obtain DNA profiles, all identity and duplicate related issues will vanish.

20.3 Person-ID system , Citizen-ID system

US has a population of about 30 crores of which about 2 crore are illegal immigrants. India has population of 110 crores and as per various estimates, we have 2 crore to 3 crore illegal Pakistanis and Bangladeshies. But US has a system of records in place to prove or disprove whether the person is illegal immigrant or legal immigrant or a citizen. Whereas India does not have any such system of records. So we demand, promise to build citizen-ID system in following way

Build Person-ID system : Issue Person-ID to every person in India and their children within one year
One year later, the Person-ID will be issued to only those whose both parents have person-ID. Thus new coming adult Bangladeshies will not be able to get Person-ID
Enact a law that employers will need to report Employee’s Person-ID to Govt. This will enable Govt to track down fake IDs and catch Bangladeshies with fake IDs. This will disable new coming adult Bangladeshies to get jobs in India , and so their inflow will reduce.
After one year, build DNA database and “relative tree” in the system – i.e. each person in system is linked to as many of his blood relatives as possible.
The person with Person-ID may approach institutions who have issued him certificates such as school leaving certificates, college degrees etc. The institutions will upload the certificates with Person-ID on registrar’s website.
A person can verify his records on Registrar’s website using his Person-ID
After one year, start Jury based tribunal to decide which person is Indian or non-Indian. After his non-Indian-ness is verified, he will be expelled from India. Such trials would go on for about 2 years
After 2 years, the Person-ID system will become Citizen-ID system

20.4 Summary of Person-ID system MRCM demands and promises

So an ID-card should have following details

ID number : 11 digit ID number issued to all adults and later only at birth
Name, address, parents’ name, parents’ IDs
Names , IDs , relation of 200 or less relatives. This feature will be useful in expelling Bangladeshies.
Date of issuing ID card, place of issuing ID card
Photographs
Names on other IDs such as ration card , school certificate if different
Date of birth, Approximate year of birth if DoB proof is not available, DoB as on other certificates.
Fingerprints : prints of thumbs and all fingers
Blood group details from randomly chosen three different labs.
DNA-prints : if and when cost becomes affordable. In the beginning, the DNA prints should be made compulsory for all Govt servants, then all citizens who earn above Rs 10 lakhs a year, then citizens who earn Rs 5 lakhs a year, then all citizens who earn Rs 200,000 a year and then all citizens at their cost and time.
If a non-citizen has obtained an ID by fraud, the Jurors can issue a prison sentence of up to 10 years. This will be also helpful in expelling Bangladeshies and Pakistani intruders.

20.5 Details of the Govt Order to Person-ID system

Basic Setup

The PM will appoint a Registrar over Person-ID system. The citizens may replace him using replacement procedures.
The PM will allocate funds necessary to him to create Person-ID system. or the Registrar may submit a proposal which and when get approved by citizens or MPs he shall get the necessary funds.
The citizens can expel the staff of Person-ID system using a Jury Trial.
The Registrar (or his staff) will issue an 11 digit serial number starting with 2 , 3 or 4 for each citizen of India resident in the district with following details : name as on ration, photograph, birth date on birth certificate, birth date on school leaving certificate (if different from birth on birth certificate), address, finger print, blood groups, DNA-prints (at later stage), serial number etc. The 11th digit will be ‘checksum’ digit.
For first year, any a person who states he is Indian citizen shall get the Person-ID. Later, if a National-level Jury decide that he was not Indian citizen, the Jurors may sentence him for up to 10 years in prison.
The Registrar will issue two ID cards - a long and a short. The small card will have only 4 details such as Name, ID number, DoB and photo and finger print. The long card will have several details such as name on ration card, name on school leaving certificate, name on PAN-ID, name of Passport, various dates of birth on passport, school leaving certificate and details blood profile, detailed DNA-profile if available and so forth.
The Registrar’s staff will take photograph and finger-prints, and scan them in computer. For each citizen, the supervisor will select 3 clerks at random who will take finger prints, photographs and scan them in computer. The Registrar will appoint and officer to investigate the cases where in these 3 finger prints mismatch and clerks who make errors will be expelled
To obtain, blood profiles, the Registrar will have about 20-40 technicians in Tahsil office to find the blood details. For each citizen, the Registrar’s clerk will randomly select 3 technicians and the who will take the blood. The blood group details will be entered only if all 3 give same results. The Registrar will personally investigate the cases where there is mismatch and disqualify the technician whose over 1% results are inaccurate.
Later, Registrar will take DNA details of a all citizens with in decreasing order of age.

20.6 Cost of Person-ID system

DNA fingerprints will be later added into the system. The above Person-ID system without blood group details and (without DNA-prints) will cost Rs 20 to Rs 50 per person and about Rs 5000 crore for whole of India. This system will be sufficient to stop inflow of Bangladeshies. The cost of blood group details will be about Rs 100 to Rs 200 and cost of DNA profile will be about Rs 1000 when done at mass scale. So the cost to build Person-ID system with DNA for whole India will be about Rs 120,000 cr or so. This cost is worth to save Asam from becoming part of Bangladesh.

19.7 Advantages of Person-ID system

Once person-ID system is enacted and every person has a person-ID, it will become possible for Govt to issue a GO that employers must report Employee’s Person-ID , and Jury may fine an employer who hires many ID-less persons. So illegal immigrants will have two options --- leave India or obtaining fake-ID or use someone else’s ID. Obtaining ID will not be possible for anyone except newborns after first year. And if he uses someone else’s ID, he will get tracked by the Govt authorities. Thus with Person-ID system, inflow of new Bangladeshies will decrease.
Once every person has ID and payer-receivers to report IDs of each other, the under-reporting of income and over-reporting of payments will reduce. This will reduce income tax evasion.
Once every person has ID and land records are tied with IDs, the under-reporting of wealth and will reduce. This will reduce wealth tax evasion.
With DNA database, the forensic will be improve and tracking suspects will become easier
With Person-ID system, tracking escapees and those who evade summons will become easier. And so law-order situation will improve.

20.8 Building Family Trees using DNA data

Lets say as on Jan-1 of year 2010 everyone’s DNA data of every person over 3 months old is in the system. Now each person can be asked to give names, IDs of his relatives. After inputting this in the system and using DNA data, the relations can be actually verified to a considerable extent. Parent-child has 50% DNA in common, siblings with same both parents have over 50% DNA in common, with one parent same have 25% DNA in common, grand child and grand parent have 25% in common, cousins have about 25% DNA in common and so forth. Using this data, a number of blood relations of a person can be verified. Higher the number of blood relatives he has, lesser are the chances the that he is immigrant. And thus using verified blood relative information, many illegal Bangladeshies who have just zero or few blood relatives can be easily identified out with a good accuracy. The system wont be able to track each of the 2cr illegal Bangladeshi, but will be able to track down sizeable number of them.

20.9 ID system in United States

Intellectuals have mislead citizens by saying that “US has ID system, but US has not been able to stop illegal immigration, so India must not waste time and money into ID system”. Their claims are wrong. US does have ID system and records that make US Govt capable of proving and disproving that person is citizen, legal immigrant or illegal immigrants. So US Govt is capable of expelling all illegal immigrants if and when needed. The USG does not expel the illegal immigrants as they provide cheap labor and are not threat to security and integrity of US. So while ID system has given capability to US to expel illegals, they dont use it for their interests. Where as in India, we have no record keeping system as of now to prove , disprove if a person is citizen or not. So we are not even in position of expelling illegals within months or even years. The records as of now are so incomplete that citizenship of mere 10% population can be fully established. Further, the Bangladeshi immigrants are threat to our security as well as integrity. So not only Indian intellectuals are lying, they are working against Indian interests in opposing ID system. We request all non-80G-activists of India to confront these intellectuals and prove to citizens that these intellectuals are anti-India.

20.10 Other party’s stand on National Person-ID system

All parties, including BJP, is against National-ID system. Which is why BJP leaders such as LKA, Pramod, Shourie, ABV etc refused to implement Person-ID system in their 7 years of regime. The reason is trivial --- a person-ID system makes it difficult to hide black wealth and black money and since they are supporters of these elitemen, they are all opposing National-ID system. We request citizen not to vote for these leaders as they are opposing National-ID system.

Right to Recall Party